KTM 125 Duke 2011 vs. Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

KTM 125 Duke 2011

KTM 125 Duke 2011

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Loading...

Technical Specifications KTM 125 Duke 2011 compared to Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

KTM 125 Duke 2011
Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore58 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke47.2 mmStroke54.5 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.6 Compression Ratio8.8
StarterStarterElectricStarterKick
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124.7 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,350 mmWheelbase1,470 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height870 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 125 Duke 2011

KTM 125 Duke 2011

High-quality, visually very appealing and yet easy to modify using the Power Parts programme supplied.

new engine

WP spring elements

LED light

Nix

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 125 Duke vs Husqvarna SM 125 S

Price KTM 125 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna SM 125 S

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons