Husqvarna FE 450 2020 vs. Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna FE 450 2020

Husqvarna FE 450 2020

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna FE 450 2020 compared to Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna FE 450 2020
Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore95 mmBore88 mm
StrokeStroke63.4 mmStroke57.5 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterKick
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement449.9 ccmDisplacement349.7 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height970 mmSeat Height970 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight108.8 kgDry Weight109.2 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8.5 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna FE 450 2020

Husqvarna FE 450 2020

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

The universal bike from Husky, it can do practically everything. And as something in between the 250 and 450, it combines the advantages of both models. It has also become somewhat stronger in 2017 and is now more comparable to the 450 in terms of responsiveness.

Probably the fastest machine on any special stage

great balance between easy handling and good performance.

Clearly more aggressive than the FE250 and therefore also more energy-consuming

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna FE 450 vs Husqvarna FE 350

Price Husqvarna FE 450

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna FE 350

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons