Suzuki B-King 2010 vs. KTM 1390 Super Duke R 2024

Suzuki B-King 2010

Suzuki B-King 2010

KTM 1390 Super Duke R 2024

KTM 1390 Super Duke R 2024

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki B-King 2010 vs KTM 1390 Super Duke R 2024

Suzuki B-King 2010

Suzuki B-King 2010

KTM 1390 Super Duke R 2024

KTM 1390 Super Duke R 2024

Technical Specifications Suzuki B-King 2010 compared to KTM 1390 Super Duke R 2024

Suzuki B-King 2010
KTM 1390 Super Duke R 2024

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeV
BoreBore81 mmBore110 mm
StrokeStroke65 mmStroke71 mm
Engine powerEngine power184 HPEngine power190 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque146 NmTorque145 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,200 rpmRpm at Torque8,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio13.2
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement1,340 ccmDisplacement1,350 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTwin-SparFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width200 mmRear tyre width200 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,525 mmWheelbase1,491 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height805 mmSeat Height834 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)259 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)212.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki B-King 2010

Suzuki B-King 2010

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

KTM 1390 Super Duke R 2024

KTM 1390 Super Duke R 2024

The Hammer engine is certainly one of the most fundamental elements of the new 1390 Super Duke R. There is no other manufacturer that can achieve this level of performance with a V2 engine while at the same time running smoothly and complying with all emissions standards. The engine alone guarantees pure riding pleasure and enables power wheelies up to third gear with good modulation. This means that the Beast has actually been sharpened up again and offers enormous fun on the race track as well as on the road, even if you have to be extremely restrained there to avoid having to give up your licence forever.

Powerful V2 with unrivalled smoothness and responsiveness

Wide range of applications from country roads to race tracks

Good ergonomics

Outstanding stability in fast corners and under braking

Precise handling on the race track

Excellent Assistance Systems and Quickshifter

Impressive engine performance that is also suitable for everyday use

Automatic gearshift somewhat rough under partial load TC control too much even at the lowest level

Suspension of the "R" has weaknesses for racetrack use - front dips a little too much

The housings of the switch units on the handlebars give way slightly and move

Many accessories at extra cost, e.g. automatic gearshift

Wide tank restricts active riding positions somewhat

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki B-King vs KTM 1390 Super Duke R

Price Suzuki B-King

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 1390 Super Duke R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH