BMW F 800 ST 2012 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW F 800 ST 2012

BMW F 800 ST 2012

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 800 ST 2012 vs BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW F 800 ST 2012

BMW F 800 ST 2012

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

Technical Specifications BMW F 800 ST 2012 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW F 800 ST 2012
BMW S 1000 R 2023

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore82 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke75.5 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power86 HPEngine power165 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque86 NmTorque114 Nm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionBeltTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSingle swing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,082 mmLength2,090 mm
WidthWidth860 mmWidth812 mm
HeightHeight1,155 mmHeight1,115 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,466 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight204 kgKerb Weight199 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity16.5 l
Top SpeedTop Speed200 km/hTop Speed200 km/h
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 800 ST 2012

BMW F 800 ST 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 800 ST vs BMW S 1000 R

Price BMW F 800 ST

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH