BMW G 310 R 2016 vs. KTM 390 Duke 2015

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2015

KTM 390 Duke 2015

Loading...

Overview - BMW G 310 R 2016 vs KTM 390 Duke 2015

The BMW G 310 R 2016 and the KTM 390 Duke 2015 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 390 Duke 2015 has a slight advantage with 44 HP compared to the BMW G 310 R 2016's 34 HP. Similarly, the KTM 390 Duke 2015 also has a higher torque of 35 Nm compared to the BMW G 310 R 2016's 28 Nm. Both bikes have a single cylinder engine and a displacement of around 300cc.

Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension, providing a smoother ride and better handling. The chassis of the BMW G 310 R 2016 is made of steel, while the KTM 390 Duke 2015 has a chromium-molybdenum frame. This difference in frame material may affect the overall weight and handling of the bikes.

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

In terms of braking, both bikes have single disk brakes at the front. The BMW G 310 R 2016 does not have any specific weaknesses in this area, while the KTM 390 Duke 2015 is equipped with an anti-hopping clutch, which helps prevent rear wheel lock-up during aggressive downshifting.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire width and diameter. The BMW G 310 R 2016 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1374 mm compared to the KTM 390 Duke 2015's 1367 mm. The seat height of the BMW G 310 R 2016 is also slightly lower at 785 mm, while the KTM 390 Duke 2015 has a seat height of 800 mm. The BMW G 310 R 2016 is slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 158.5 kg compared to the KTM 390 Duke 2015's 139 kg. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 11 liters.

KTM 390 Duke 2015

KTM 390 Duke 2015

In terms of strengths, the BMW G 310 R 2016 is praised for its handling, weight, ingenious chassis, and stability. On the other hand, the KTM 390 Duke 2015 is known for its anti-hopping clutch, pleasant performance, compact geometry, and low weight.

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW G 310 R 2016 is noted to have a weak brake pedal. The KTM 390 Duke 2015 is mentioned to be a little tight for tall people, possibly due to its slightly higher seat height.

Overall, both the BMW G 310 R 2016 and the KTM 390 Duke 2015 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two models would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities, such as power, handling, and comfort.

Technical Specifications BMW G 310 R 2016 compared to KTM 390 Duke 2015

BMW G 310 R 2016
KTM 390 Duke 2015

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore89 mm
StrokeStroke62 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power34 HPEngine power44 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque28 NmTorque35 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.6 Compression Ratio12.6
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement313 ccmDisplacement373.2 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

Shock mountShock mountdirectShock mountdirect

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,374 mmWheelbase1,367 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height800 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)158.5 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)139 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

On the first few metres, I briefly thought that the power was a bit lacking. However, after a while it quickly became clear that power is not everything and that ultimate driving pleasure can be guaranteed even with little horsepower. In the US, there are traffic rules called "lane splitting", which means moving forward between cars when there is a traffic jam. Before the traffic lights, for example. I have to admit that I didn't feel so comfortable here at the beginning. A Porsche on the left, a Dodge on the right, you really don't want to swerve with your bike. However, the handlebars of the BMW G310R are rather narrow and you can really cheat your way forward through the queues of cars without a second thought! The only shortcoming I noticed right at the start is the brake pedal. Unfortunately, it's a bit far down. The rear brake was also a little late in engaging. But that can certainly be optimised with an adjustment. All in all, it is a very successful bike. It is super versatile, really fun in every area and you feel comfortable from the first moment! Depending on the rev range you are in, you can adapt the bike to your riding style. Cruising at low revs and super sporty riding at high revs! The perfect all-round roadster at a great price.

Handling

weight

ingenious chassis

stability

Brake pedal

KTM 390 Duke 2015

KTM 390 Duke 2015

"I'm not a girl, not yet a woman" sang Britney Spears in an innocently erotic voice, trying to make the whole world believe she wasn't already dating Justin Timberlake fi...Well, in any case, this is a transitional phase, as the 390 Duke also describes with its essence. No longer a small Duke, but not yet a big one either, the 390 is right in the middle. You shouldn't underestimate it, but you shouldn't expect too much either. If you keep this in mind, you will have a lot of fun with it, even on a not too fast race track. (However, not too many thousands should be on the road then.) Feather-light handling like a moped, but already as strong as many a 600cc funk bike from the last 10 years.

Anti-hopping clutch

pleasant performance

compact geometry

low weight

a little tight for tall people

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW G 310 R vs KTM 390 Duke

There are a few key differences between a BMW G 310 R 2016 and a KTM 390 Duke 2015. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the BMW G 310 R and 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW G 310 R was published on 07/10/2015 and now has more than 28,500 views. This compares to more than 26,300 views for the first review on KTM 390 Duke published on 12/11/2012.

Price BMW G 310 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 390 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH