Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 vs Yamaha MT-09 2016

The Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications, but there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a slight advantage with 115 HP compared to the Yamaha FZ-8N 2011's 106 HP. The MT-09 also has a higher torque of 87.5 Nm compared to the FZ-8N's 82 Nm. However, the FZ-8N has four cylinders and a displacement of 779 ccm, while the MT-09 has three cylinders and a displacement of 847 ccm. This difference in cylinder configuration may result in a different riding experience and engine characteristics.

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Both bikes have double disk front brakes and the same tire dimensions, with a front tire width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, and a rear tire width of 180 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The FZ-8N has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1460 mm compared to the MT-09's 1440 mm. Both bikes have the same seat height of 815 mm.

In terms of weight, the MT-09 is lighter with a kerb weight of 188 kg compared to the FZ-8N's 211 kg. The MT-09 also has a smaller fuel tank capacity of 14 liters compared to the FZ-8N's 17 liters.

When it comes to strengths, the FZ-8N is known for its stability and universal chassis. It also has a large variety of accessories available and offers acceptable performance. On the other hand, the MT-09 boasts a wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant and offers three power modes for different riding preferences. It also has a fully adjustable chassis, a quickshifter as standard, and a sporty upright seating position. The MT-09 also has good brakes, aggressive looks, and traction control.

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

In terms of weaknesses, the FZ-8N has been criticized for its footrest detent insert setting too early, which can lead to instability in the chassis and scraping on the ground. It also has an unappealing exhaust and is considered a bit cumbersome. The MT-09's weaknesses include a saddle that may be too hard for long tours and a license plate holder on the swingarm that offers less splash protection than a conventional one.

Overall, both the Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two would depend on individual preferences and priorities, such as desired power, riding style, and specific features.

Technical Specifications Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011
Yamaha MT-09 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore68 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke53.6 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power106 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque82 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement779 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeDeltaboxFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,140 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth770 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight211 kgKerb Weight188 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

But as in life, you can't demonise the "approximate 3/4 litre" concept of the FZ-8 by quickly leafing through the data sheets. That would be a shame, because the 8 has given us a lot of pleasure in the 3,200 kilometres we have covered so far. Contrary to the facts, the 800 is probably the best choice for the average ambitious rider.

Stable and stable

chassis relatively universal

large variety of accessories

acceptable performance

Footrest detent insert sets too early and brings unsteadiness into the chassis - as well as scraping on the ground

ugly exhaust

a bit cumbersome

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

The Yamaha MT-09 did not need to be reinvented for the coming season - it already was extremely well done almost four years ago. Instead, the Japanese focus on fine-tuning and adding practical, contemporary gimmicks such as traction control and automatic shifting. Due to the Euro4 standard, however, the engine management has been changed once again and offers an emphatically powerful but well controllable power delivery in standard mode; the power explosion of the first generation is now no longer offered even by the sharper A mode. The biggest change, recognisable at first glance, is the, in my opinion, extremely successful design with the more aggressive front and the newly designed rear. All in all, an even snazzier naked bike that was clearly built for the fun of motorcycling.

Wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant

three power modes

fully adjustable chassis

quickshifter as standard

sporty upright seating position

good brakes

aggressive looks

traction control.

Saddle a little too hard for long tours

licence plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha FZ-8N vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 and a Yamaha MT-09 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-09 2016 is about 23% higher. A Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 experiences a loss of 1,080 GBP in one year and 1,010 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 430 GBP and 730 GBP for a Yamaha MT-09 2016. Compared to Yamaha MT-09 2016 there are more Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 13 compared to 11. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha FZ-8N with 70 days compared to 87 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 11 reviews for the Yamaha FZ-8N and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Yamaha FZ-8N was published on 27/01/2010 and now has more than 8,200 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 10/06/2013.

Price Yamaha FZ-8N

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH