Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2005 vs. Yamaha XJ6 2009

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2005

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2005

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2005 compared to Yamaha XJ6 2009

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2005
Yamaha XJ6 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power126 HPEngine power78 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement636 ccmDisplacement600 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,390 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height785 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight163 kgDry Weight205 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity17.3 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2005

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R 2005

The Kawa leaves nothing to be desired. Engine, chassis and brakes will satisfy you 100%. This machine will make the intensive lap times drop, even the rider will not be able to prevent that.

Anti-hopping clutch

strong overall package

optimal chassis

stability

works with all tyres

almost complete.

Unsteady handling on complex tracks with bumps

very sporty overall set-up => advantage for racetrack, disadvantage for road

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Despite the common basis, the XJ appears much younger and more aggressive. A mid-cass motorbike that by no means makes you feel mid-range. Except for the swingarm, the motorbike appears quite high-quality and cool. The bike is a little easier to handle than the Diversion.

rider-friendly performance characteristics

optimal clutch

playful, lighter handling

seat comfort

individual look

young

aggressive

high-quality.

Design components not too demanding

torque development

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R vs Yamaha XJ6

Price Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha XJ6

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons