Husqvarna FC 350 2018 vs. Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna FC 350 2018

Husqvarna FC 350 2018

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna FC 350 2018 compared to Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna FC 350 2018
Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore88 mmBore88 mm
StrokeStroke57.5 mmStroke57.5 mm
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement349.7 ccmDisplacement349.7 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width110 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,485 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height960 mmSeat Height970 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight100.4 kgDry Weight109.2 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna FC 350 2018

Husqvarna FC 350 2018

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

Husqvarna FE 350 2016

The universal bike from Husky, it can do practically everything. And as something in between the 250 and 450, it combines the advantages of both models. It has also become somewhat stronger in 2017 and is now more comparable to the 450 in terms of responsiveness.

Probably the fastest machine on any special stage

great balance between easy handling and good performance.

Clearly more aggressive than the FE250 and therefore also more energy-consuming

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna FC 350 vs Husqvarna FE 350

Price Husqvarna FC 350

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna FE 350

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH