Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016 vs. Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016 vs Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016 and the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017 are both high-performance supersport motorcycles that offer impressive specifications and features.

In terms of engine and drive train, both models have an in-line 4-cylinder engine with a bore of 76 mm and a stroke of 55 mm. The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R has a slightly higher engine power of 200.1 HP compared to the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade's 192 HP. However, both models have a similar torque of around 114 Nm. Both motorcycles have a compression ratio of 13 and a displacement of around 1000 cc.

In terms of suspension, both models feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The suspension on both motorcycles can be adjusted for compression, preload, and rebound. The rear suspension on both models is made of aluminum, which helps in reducing weight and improving performance.

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016

Both motorcycles have an aluminum frame, which provides strength and rigidity while keeping the weight low. The front brakes on both models are double disk with radial technology, providing excellent stopping power. However, the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade has monoblock technology, which further enhances the braking performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm. The front and rear tire diameters are both 17 inches. The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1415 mm compared to the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade's 1405 mm. The seat height of the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R is 813 mm, while the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade has a slightly higher seat height of 832 mm. The fuel tank capacity of the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R is 17 liters, while the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade has a slightly smaller fuel tank capacity of 16 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016 offers great chassis geometry and high-quality chassis components, which contribute to its excellent handling. It also has very good brakes and a wide range of electronics on board, providing advanced features and assistance to the rider.

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

On the other hand, the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017 has good brakes, a low weight, and nimble handling, making it agile and easy to maneuver. Its engine delivers plenty of power throughout the rev range, and it boasts high build quality, ensuring durability and reliability.

However, the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016 has a weakness in terms of the cockpit, which is not optimally readable, potentially affecting the rider's visibility. On the other hand, the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017 lacks a shift assistant, and its throttle grip can be sluggish and imprecise. Additionally, while the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade's chassis performs well on the racetrack, it may not be as precise in setting the scene for great handling. It also has some disadvantages at peak performance on long straights.

In conclusion, both the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016 and the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017 are impressive supersport motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R offers excellent chassis geometry, high-quality components, and advanced electronics, while the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade provides good brakes, nimble handling, and a powerful engine. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016 compared to Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016
Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore76 mmBore76 mm
StrokeStroke55 mmStroke55 mm
Engine powerEngine power200.1 HPEngine power192 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpm
TorqueTorque114.3 NmTorque114 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque11,500 rpmRpm at Torque11,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio13
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionDigital, Transistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement998 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, PetalTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,065 mm
WidthWidth715 mmWidth720 mm
HeightHeight1,115 mmHeight1,125 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,415 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height813 mmSeat Height832 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016

Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016

The ZX-10R Ninja has a certain majesty, at the first rollout it seems very stable, you have to force it into the radius a little. After a few laps, however, this effect is transformed into an incredible precision that allows a pinpoint line. The engine has now really become noticeably stronger and makes the Kawa an enormously good overall package that can please not only die-hard Kawasaki fans. The traction control on the Kawa is particularly positive and regulates very sensitively. You can even adjust the engine brake - so it certainly doesn't lack for electronic features. The ZX-10R is the only superbike that is already Euro4-compliant in 2016!

great chassis geometry

high-quality chassis components

very good brakes

lots of electronics on board

Cockpit not quite optimal readable

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

A worthy new edition from Honda. Even if it doesn't quite shine as brightly in the standard version as it does with the Öhlins Gold in the "SP" version, the Fireblade is a much better bike in 2017. The electronics package is good, the handling great and the seating position very good. The bike looks like a unified whole and will make Honda fans happy.

Good brakes

Low weight and nimble handling

Engine has plenty of power from the rev range

High build quality

No shift assistant

sluggish and not very precise throttle grip

chassis "nice" on the racetrack but not good enough to precisely set the scene for the great handling

disadvantages at peak performance on long straights

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R vs Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016 and a Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016 is about 50% higher. A Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R 2016 experiences a loss of 1,670 GBP in one year and 1,630 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 520 GBP and 670 GBP for a Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 4. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R with 100 days compared to 112 days for a Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 51 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R and 71 reviews for the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade since model year 2005. The first review for the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R was published on 11/01/2004 and now has more than 2,900 views. This compares to more than 3,700 views for the first review on Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade published on 25/11/2003.

Price Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH