Husqvarna SM 610 2005 vs. Yamaha XT 660R 2016

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Yamaha XT 660R 2016

Yamaha XT 660R 2016

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 610 2005 vs Yamaha XT 660R 2016

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Yamaha XT 660R 2016

Yamaha XT 660R 2016

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2005 compared to Yamaha XT 660R 2016

Husqvarna SM 610 2005
Yamaha XT 660R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power60 HPEngine power48 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement576 ccmDisplacement660 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,500 mmWheelbase1,505 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height920 mmSeat Height865 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12.5 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

Yamaha XT 660R 2016

Yamaha XT 660R 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna SM 610 vs Yamaha XT 660R

Price Husqvarna SM 610

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Yamaha XT 660R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH