Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs. Kawasaki Z 750 2008

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Kawasaki Z 750 2008

Kawasaki Z 750 2008

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs Kawasaki Z 750 2008

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Kawasaki Z 750 2008

Kawasaki Z 750 2008

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 compared to Kawasaki Z 750 2008

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Kawasaki Z 750 2008

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power132 HPEngine power110 HP
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement748 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,437 mmWheelbase1,425 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height828 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Even a Super Duke is in a tight spot when the bends are not too sharp and the KTM can make full use of its radical handling and its unrivalled ability to correct the radius on naked bikes. The Speed Triple is more harmonious, patient and predictable. The Duke has to be beaten, the Triple can also be stroked.

Controlled chassis

hard sound

stable.

Rough gearing sometimes disturbs the idyll between man and machine.

Kawasaki Z 750 2008

Kawasaki Z 750 2008

A good bike at a very good price, especially the upside-down fork is convincing.

improved torque curve

upside-down fork

aggressive engine

low price

high weight

4 hp less than the predecessor

not exactly effortless driving

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Kawasaki Z 750

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z 750

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons