Yamaha MT-09 2013 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2013 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

The Yamaha MT-09 2013 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 are both naked bikes with similar engine configurations. The Yamaha MT-09 is equipped with an in-line 3-cylinder engine with a displacement of 847cc, producing 115 horsepower and 87.5 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 features an in-line 3-cylinder engine with a larger displacement of 1050cc, delivering 132 horsepower and 110 Nm of torque.

In terms of power, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 has the upper hand with its higher horsepower and torque figures. This results in a more exhilarating and thrilling riding experience, especially at higher speeds. However, the Yamaha MT-09 offers a more reasonable price compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050, making it a more affordable option for riders on a budget.

Both bikes feature a twin-tube aluminum frame, providing a sturdy and stable platform for handling and maneuverability. The Yamaha MT-09 has a telescopic fork front suspension, while the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 is equipped with an upside-down telescopic fork. Both suspension setups offer good performance and ensure a comfortable ride.

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

In terms of dimensions, the Yamaha MT-09 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440mm compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050's 1437mm. This may result in a slightly more stable and planted feel for the Yamaha MT-09. The seat height of the Yamaha MT-09 is 815mm, while the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 has a slightly higher seat height of 828mm.

When it comes to tire specifications, both bikes have a front tire width of 120mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 has a wider rear tire width of 190mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09's 180mm. This wider rear tire may provide better traction and stability during cornering for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050.

In terms of weight, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 is heavier with a kerb weight of 219kg, while the Yamaha MT-09 weighs 188kg. This weight difference may affect the agility and maneuverability of the bikes, with the Yamaha MT-09 potentially offering a more nimble and responsive ride.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

One weakness of the Yamaha MT-09 is its hard chassis, which may result in a slightly harsher ride compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050. Additionally, the Yamaha MT-09 has a higher fuel consumption compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050, which may be a concern for riders looking for a more fuel-efficient option.

On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 has been noted to have rough gearing at times, which can disrupt the harmony between the rider and the machine. This may be a drawback for riders seeking a smoother and more refined riding experience.

In conclusion, the Yamaha MT-09 2013 offers a reasonable price and a powerful engine, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious riders. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 boasts a controlled chassis, a hard sound, and stability, providing a more thrilling and exhilarating riding experience. However, the rough gearing of the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and the higher fuel consumption of the Yamaha MT-09 may be potential drawbacks for some riders. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2013 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Yamaha MT-09 2013
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power132 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque110 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,086 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth728 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,120 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,437 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height828 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight188 kgKerb Weight219 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

The start is frightening - abandonment of 1st gear.

Reasonable price

powerful engine

Hard chassis

high consumption

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Even a Super Duke is in a tight spot when the bends are not too sharp and the KTM can make full use of its radical handling and its unrivalled ability to correct the radius on naked bikes. The Speed Triple is more harmonious, patient and predictable. The Duke has to be beaten, the Triple can also be stroked.

Controlled chassis

hard sound

stable.

Rough gearing sometimes disturbs the idyll between man and machine.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-09 2013 and a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 52 days compared to 77 days for a Triumph Speed Triple 1050. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 and 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 since model year 2005. The first review for the Yamaha MT-09 was published on 10/06/2013 and now has more than 39,900 views. This compares to more than 16,200 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple 1050 published on 02/10/2007.

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH