Yamaha Aerox R 2010 vs. Fantic XM 50 Performance 2022

Yamaha Aerox R 2010

Yamaha Aerox R 2010

Fantic XM 50 Performance 2022

Fantic XM 50 Performance 2022

Loading...

Technical Specifications Yamaha Aerox R 2010 compared to Fantic XM 50 Performance 2022

Yamaha Aerox R 2010
Fantic XM 50 Performance 2022

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore40 mmBore40.3 mm
StrokeStroke39.2 mmStroke39 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
Clutch TypeClutch TypeCentrifugal forceClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width130 mmFront tyre width100 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height60 %Front tyre height80 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter13 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width130 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter13 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength1,743 mmLength2,040 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,256 mmWheelbase1,420 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height828 mmSeat Height870 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7 lFuel Tank Capacity7.5 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha Aerox R vs Fantic XM 50 Performance

Price Yamaha Aerox R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Fantic XM 50 Performance

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons