Yamaha R1 2016 vs. BMW S 1000 RR 2012

Yamaha R1 2016

Yamaha R1 2016

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha R1 2016 vs BMW S 1000 RR 2012

The Yamaha R1 model year 2016 and the BMW S 1000 RR model year 2012 are both supersport motorcycles that offer high performance and advanced features. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine specifications, the Yamaha R1 2016 has a bore of 79 mm and a stroke of 50.9 mm, while the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 has a slightly larger bore of 80 mm and a stroke of 49.7 mm. Both bikes have a 4-cylinder engine with a displacement of around 1000 cc. The Yamaha R1 2016 has a slightly higher engine power of 200 HP compared to the BMW S 1000 RR 2012's 192 HP. However, both bikes have a similar torque output, with the Yamaha R1 2016 producing 112.4 Nm and the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 producing 112 Nm. Both bikes also have a compression ratio of 13.

Yamaha R1 2016

Yamaha R1 2016

In terms of suspension, the Yamaha R1 2016 features an upside-down telescopic fork at the front, while the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 has a telescopic fork. Both bikes have an aluminum frame, with the Yamaha R1 2016 featuring a Deltabox frame and the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 featuring a Twin Tube frame. Both bikes also have double disk brakes at the front.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha R1 2016 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm, with both bikes having a 17-inch diameter for the front and rear tires. The Yamaha R1 2016 has a wheelbase of 1405 mm, while the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1432 mm. The seat height of the Yamaha R1 2016 is 855 mm, while the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 has a slightly lower seat height of 820 mm. The Yamaha R1 2016 has a kerb weight (with ABS) of 199 kg, while the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 is slightly heavier with a kerb weight (with ABS) of 207 kg. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of around 17 liters, with the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 having a slightly larger capacity of 17.5 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha R1 2016 is known for its lively handling, high-revving and precisely controllable engine, and excellent electronics package. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 is praised for its complete electronic equipment, good braking system, strong engine, and extremely fast performance on the road. The BMW S 1000 RR 2012 also has an appropriate appearance.

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

However, the Yamaha R1 2016 does have a weakness in that its shift assistant is only available for upshifting. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 has a somewhat complicated chassis that may take some time to get used to.

Overall, both the Yamaha R1 2016 and the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 are highly capable supersport motorcycles with their own set of strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha R1 2016 compared to BMW S 1000 RR 2012

Yamaha R1 2016
BMW S 1000 RR 2012

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore79 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power200 HPEngine power192 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112.4 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque11,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio13
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement998 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDeltaboxFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,055 mmLength2,056 mm
WidthWidth690 mmWidth826 mm
HeightHeight1,150 mmHeight1,138 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,405 mmWheelbase1,432 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height855 mmSeat Height820 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)199 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha R1 2016

Yamaha R1 2016

Yamaha's high-tech rocket is still a technological leader in 2016. Radical, polarising and fascinating, it sets powerful lap times. It is closer to the race bikes than the other 1000s. In the meantime, no one grumbles about the front. Without the "M", it is the best choice for those who don't need Öhlins anyway, or the best choice for those who are planning a racetrack conversion anyway and like to install "normal" Öhlins hardware without electric stuff.

Lively handling

high-revving and precisely controllable engine

excellent electronics package

Shift assistant only for upshifting

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

The BMW can still score points with hard facts in 2015. If you like top performance, you have to buy the BMW. It turns out incredibly powerful at the top and drives away the rest of the field from 200. Big and heavy riders will be able to benefit from this even more. BMW didn't make it easy for themselves with this bike and put together a very universal motorbike. If you were to do a comparison test with 50 different riders (from rookie to pro), the BMW would have the best average of all 1000cc bikes. The electronic chassis, but also the riding aids, make the pros fast and the beginners safe on the road. A top recommendation for a very broad target group. Very fast hobby riders will not be 100% satisfied with the standard suspension. If you don't want to modify the chassis, you should rather go for an R1M, a Panigale S or an RSV RF. If you want to convert anyway, the S 1000 RR is the strongest and most universal base. Surprisingly, the powerful machine also rides very well on country roads. All in all, it looks like a compromise, but it never feels like one in practice.

Superb shift assistant

incredibly powerful and rev-happy engine

great range of accessories

race-ready data logging tool and calibration tool available.

Chassis quickly at the limit in the hands of professionals

Price Comparison Average Market Price Yamaha R1 vs BMW S 1000 RR

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha R1 2016 and a BMW S 1000 RR 2012. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha R1 2016 is about 40% higher. A Yamaha R1 2016 experiences a loss of 680 GBP in one year and 600 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 300 GBP and 430 GBP for a BMW S 1000 RR 2012. Compared to BMW S 1000 RR 2012 there are less Yamaha R1 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 6 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 RR with 64 days compared to 73 days for the Yamaha R1. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 80 reviews for the Yamaha R1 and 135 reviews for the BMW S 1000 RR since model year 2010. The first review for the Yamaha R1 was published on 28/04/2003 and now has more than 3,900 views. This compares to more than 4,000 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 RR published on 16/04/2008.

Price Yamaha R1

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons