Yamaha R125 2023 vs. Cagiva Mito 125 2014

Yamaha R125 2023

Cagiva Mito 125 2014
Loading...
Overview - Yamaha R125 2023 vs Cagiva Mito 125 2014

Yamaha R125 2023

Cagiva Mito 125 2014
Technical Specifications Yamaha R125 2023 compared to Cagiva Mito 125 2014
Yamaha R125 2023
Cagiva Mito 125 2014
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 52 mm | Bore | 56 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 58.6 mm | Stroke | 50.6 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 15 HP | Engine power | 13 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 9,000 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 9,000 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 12.4 Nm | Torque | 11 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 8,000 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 7,500 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 11.2 | Compression Ratio | 7.4 |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 1 | Cylinders | 1 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 2-Stroke |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 124.7 ccm | Displacement | 124.6 ccm |
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Aluminium |
---|
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 100 mm | Front tyre width | 110 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 80 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 140 mm | Rear tyre width | 150 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 70 % | Rear tyre height | 60 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,355 mm | Wheelbase | 1,375 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 825 mm | Seat Height | 760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 11.5 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 14 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A1 | License compliancy | A1 |
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha R125 vs Cagiva Mito 125
Price Yamaha R125
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Cagiva Mito 125
Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.