Yamaha YZF-R3 2015 vs. KTM RC 390 2014

Yamaha YZF-R3 2015

Yamaha YZF-R3 2015

KTM RC 390 2014

KTM RC 390 2014

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha YZF-R3 2015 vs KTM RC 390 2014

When comparing the Yamaha YZF-R3 2015 and the KTM RC 390 2014, there are several key differences to consider.

In terms of engine and drive train, the Yamaha YZF-R3 has a smaller bore and stroke at 68mm and 44.1mm respectively, compared to the KTM RC 390's 89mm bore and 60mm stroke. The Yamaha YZF-R3 also has a slightly lower engine power at 42 HP compared to the KTM RC 390's 44 HP. However, the Yamaha YZF-R3 has a higher torque at 29.6 Nm compared to the KTM RC 390's 35 Nm. The compression ratio is also slightly higher in the Yamaha YZF-R3 at 11.2 compared to the KTM RC 390's 12.5.

In terms of cylinders and valves, the Yamaha YZF-R3 has 2 cylinders and 4 valves per cylinder, while the KTM RC 390 has 1 cylinder and 4 valves per cylinder. Both bikes have DOHC valves. The Yamaha YZF-R3 has a smaller displacement at 321ccm compared to the KTM RC 390's 373.2ccm.

Yamaha YZF-R3 2015

Yamaha YZF-R3 2015

In terms of chassis, the Yamaha YZF-R3 has a twin tube frame type, while the KTM RC 390 has a tubular frame type.

Both bikes have single disk front brakes and the same front tire width and diameter at 110mm and 17 inches respectively. However, the Yamaha YZF-R3 has a slightly narrower rear tire width at 140mm compared to the KTM RC 390's 150mm. Both bikes have the same rear tire diameter at 17 inches.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha YZF-R3 has a longer wheelbase at 1380mm compared to the KTM RC 390's 1340mm. The seat height is also lower in the Yamaha YZF-R3 at 780mm compared to the KTM RC 390's 820mm. The Yamaha YZF-R3 is slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 169kg compared to the KTM RC 390's 147kg. The Yamaha YZF-R3 also has a larger fuel tank capacity at 14 liters compared to the KTM RC 390's 10 liters.

KTM RC 390 2014

KTM RC 390 2014

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha YZF-R3 has a transparent and precise front, strong brakes, a lively engine, sensational top speed, and relaxed geometry. On the other hand, the KTM RC 390 has the strengths of low weight, sufficient power, pleasant geometry, unique design, great features, and a full performance accessory range.

In terms of weaknesses, the Yamaha YZF-R3 has some unattractive parts and a high price. The KTM RC 390 has spongy and weak brakes, insufficient lean angle clearance for the race track, and a stony hard seat.

Overall, the Yamaha YZF-R3 2015 and the KTM RC 390 2014 have their own unique strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha YZF-R3 2015 compared to KTM RC 390 2014

Yamaha YZF-R3 2015
KTM RC 390 2014
Show all
Same only
Differences
Yamaha YZF-R3 2015
Yamaha YZF-R3 2015
KTM RC 390 2014
KTM RC 390 2014

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,380 mmWheelbase1,340 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height780 mmSeat Height820 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)169 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)147 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity10 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha YZF-R3 2015

Yamaha YZF-R3 2015

Yamaha sees its R3 more in line with the equally versatile Kawasaki Ninja 300, but the price is even higher than that of the KTM390. This makes the YZF-R3 a premium product, which is a bold decision in this class. But the overall package offers corresponding value: sporty engine, stable chassis, strong brakes, sensational top speed. Direct comparison will show who really has the edge. In any case, the R3 is a hot contender for the number 1 spot.

transparent, precise front

strong brakes

lively engine

sensational top speed

relaxed geometry

in detail some unattractive parts

high price

KTM RC 390 2014

KTM RC 390 2014

The RC390 has opened my eyes and I hope that there is a lot more to come with small displacement. Low weight still leads to the greatest enjoyment when riding a motorbike, although you can't do without a bit of power either. But the 390 somehow managed to inspire me with its 44 hp and to break me of my addiction to even more power. I'm going to build a small race track 2.5 km long with 14 bends and then there'll be a 1000PS RC390 Cup.

Low weight

Sufficient power

Pleasant geometry

Unique design, Great features

Full performance accessory range.

Spongy and weak brakes

Insufficient lean angle clearance for race track

Stony hard seat

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha YZF-R3 vs KTM RC 390

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha YZF-R3 2015 and a KTM RC 390 2014. It takes less time to sell a KTM RC 390 with 65 days compared to 110 days for the Yamaha YZF-R3. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 11 reviews for the Yamaha YZF-R3 and 20 reviews for the KTM RC 390 since model year 2014. The first review for the Yamaha YZF-R3 was published on 17/10/2014 and now has more than 53,600 views. This compares to more than 23,900 views for the first review on KTM RC 390 published on 04/11/2013.

Price Yamaha YZF-R3

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM RC 390

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen