Kawasaki Z900 2021 vs. Yamaha YZF-R6 2012

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Yamaha YZF-R6 2012
Loading...
Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2021 compared to Yamaha YZF-R6 2012
Kawasaki Z900 2021
Yamaha YZF-R6 2012
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 73.4 mm | Bore | 67 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 56 mm | Stroke | 42.5 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 125.4 HP | Engine power | 124 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 9,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 14,500 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 98.6 Nm | Torque | 65.7 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 7,700 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 10,500 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 11.8 | Compression Ratio | 13 |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Ignition | Ignition | Digital | Ignition | Transistor |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 4 | Cylinders | 4 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Valves per cylinder | Valves per cylinder | 4 | Valves per cylinder | 4 |
Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | DOHC |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 948 ccm | Displacement | 599 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork |
---|
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Aluminium |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Double cradle | Frame type | Deltabox |
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 180 mm | Rear tyre width | 180 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 55 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,070 mm | Length | 2,040 mm |
Width | Width | 820 mm | Width | 705 mm |
Height | Height | 1,065 mm | Height | 1,095 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,450 mm | Wheelbase | 1,375 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 795 mm | Seat Height | 850 mm |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Kawasaki Z900 2021

In terms of price-performance, the Kawasaki Z900 is hard to beat at the moment. With the perfectly tuned engine, the high-quality chassis components and the electronics added for 2020, this naked bike offers everything that sporty riders will be looking for. There is really nothing to complain about, except for the lack of a quickshifter option.
powerful four-cylinder
intuitive handling
good equipment
aggressive looks
value for money
No quickshifter option
competitors with 6-axis IMU electronically ahead.
Yamaha YZF-R6 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Yamaha YZF-R6
Price Kawasaki Z900
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Yamaha YZF-R6
Model year
Current average market prices