Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 vs Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 compared to Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009
Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power72 HPEngine power72 HP
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height785 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight204 kgDry Weight179 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.5 lFuel Tank Capacity15.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Regardless of whether you take it on the dull way to work or on extended tours, the comfortable seating position, the quiet, low-vibration in-line two-cylinder and the agility in the angular movement bring riding pleasure in every situation.

Powerful sound

mobility

reasonable price

visually sophisticated

safe riding experience

(re-)beginner-friendly.

72 hp does not tear legs out

Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Kawasaki doesn't build toys. The ER-6N is getting more serious - and remains beginner-friendly.

Lightness

precision

rideability

modern, dynamic look

beginner-friendly

trustworthy ergonomics

ABS.

Sitting position with regard to the footrests uncomfortable from 1.80m

hardly suitable for wheelies

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6f vs Kawasaki ER-6n

Price Kawasaki ER-6f

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH