Yamaha WR 250R 2017 vs. Husqvarna TE 449 2013

Technical Specifications Yamaha WR 250R 2017 compared to Husqvarna TE 449 2013

Yamaha WR 250R 2017

Husqvarna TE 449 2013

Show all

Same only

Differences

Yamaha WR 250R 2017

Husqvarna TE 449 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	77 mm	Bore	98 mm
Stroke	Stroke	53.6 mm	Stroke	59.6 mm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	11.8	Compression Ratio	12
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	250 ccm	Displacement	449.6 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	80 mm	Front tyre width	90 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	100 %	Front tyre height	90 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	120 mm	Rear tyre width	140 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	80 %	Rear tyre height	80 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Length	Length	2,180 mm	Length	2,280 mm
Width	Width	810 mm	Width	820 mm
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,420 mm	Wheelbase	1,490 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	930 mm	Seat Height	963 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	7.6 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	8.5 l