Kawasaki Z 800 e 2017 vs. Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2021

Kawasaki Z 800 e 2017

Kawasaki Z 800 e 2017

Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2021

Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2021

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z 800 e 2017 vs Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2021

Kawasaki Z 800 e 2017

Kawasaki Z 800 e 2017

Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2021

Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2021

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z 800 e 2017 compared to Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2021

Kawasaki Z 800 e 2017
Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore71 mmBore92 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke81.5 mm
Engine powerEngine power95 HPEngine power102 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpm
TorqueTorque76 NmTorque105 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,000 rpmRpm at Torque6,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.9 Compression Ratio10.1
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement806 ccmDisplacement1,084 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial, Wave

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
LengthLength2,100 mmLength2,330 mm
WidthWidth800 mmWidth960 mm
HeightHeight1,050 mmHeight1,395 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,445 mmWheelbase1,575 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height834 mmSeat Height850 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity18.8 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z 800 e 2017

Kawasaki Z 800 e 2017

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2021

Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin 2021

For me, the Africa Twin is a touring enduro as a touring enduro should be. This was already true of the predecessor model and did not change with the increase in displacement and power. Because the latter remained manageable at 102 hp, and Honda even managed to shed a few kilos compared to the CRF1000L. So it remained versatile, functioning just as well on the motorway as off-road. The chassis absorbs almost all bumps, the engine remains sovereign in every situation, ergonomics and seating comfort are exemplary. A motorbike for all days as well as for the big trip - wherever that may be.

powerful engine

sophisticated electronic driving aids

wonderfully functioning DCT (option)

touch-screen colour display

good ergonomics

Long-distance capability

Windshield good for off-road

Operating concept of the electronics not very clear and intuitive

Handguards not very robust for off-road use

Windshield offers manageable protection

Ergonomics not ideal for standing riding

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z 800 e vs Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin

Price Kawasaki Z 800 e

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CRF1100L Africa Twin

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons