Derbi Mulhacen 659 2007 vs. KTM 690 Duke 2010

Derbi Mulhacen 659 2007

Derbi Mulhacen 659 2007

KTM 690 Duke 2010

KTM 690 Duke 2010

Loading...

Overview - Derbi Mulhacen 659 2007 vs KTM 690 Duke 2010

Derbi Mulhacen 659 2007

Derbi Mulhacen 659 2007

KTM 690 Duke 2010

KTM 690 Duke 2010

Technical Specifications Derbi Mulhacen 659 2007 compared to KTM 690 Duke 2010

Derbi Mulhacen 659 2007
KTM 690 Duke 2010

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power48 HPEngine power65 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement659 ccmDisplacement654 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,386 mmWheelbase1,472 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height865 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight165 kgDry Weight148.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity13 lFuel Tank Capacity13.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Derbi Mulhacen 659 2007

Derbi Mulhacen 659 2007

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

KTM 690 Duke 2010

KTM 690 Duke 2010

Are there so many people who don't need 100 hp to stabilise their ego? I think with previous single-cylinder models, it was always the design that was the problem, not the lack of power. The Duke manages to look really high-quality even as a small single-cylinder.

Stable frame

relatively low overall weight

good chassis

high-quality components

strong braking system

handling.

Significantly weaker single-cylinder engine

somewhat less comfort

somewhat less power.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Derbi Mulhacen 659 vs KTM 690 Duke

Price Derbi Mulhacen 659

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price KTM 690 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH