Triumph Daytona 675 R 2013 vs. Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2013

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2013

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Daytona 675 R 2013 vs Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

When comparing the Triumph Daytona 675 R 2013 and the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017, there are several key differences to consider.

In terms of engine and drive train, both motorcycles have an in-line engine type with a bore of 76 mm. However, the Daytona 675 R has a stroke of 49.6 mm, while the Fireblade has a stroke of 55 mm. This difference in stroke contributes to the Fireblade's higher engine power of 192 HP, compared to the Daytona's 128 HP. The Fireblade also has higher torque at 114 Nm, compared to the Daytona's 74 Nm. The compression ratio is 12.6 for the Daytona and 13 for the Fireblade. The Daytona has 3 cylinders, while the Fireblade has 4 cylinders. Both motorcycles have 4 valves per cylinder and DOHC valves. The displacement is 675 ccm for the Daytona and 999 ccm for the Fireblade.

In terms of suspension, both motorcycles have upside-down telescopic forks at the front. The Daytona has compression and rebound adjustment, while the Fireblade has compression, preload, and rebound adjustment for a more customizable riding experience. The rear suspension on both motorcycles also has compression, preload, and rebound adjustment.

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2013

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2013

In terms of brakes, both motorcycles have radial, monoblock brakes at the front. The Daytona uses Brembo brakes, while the Fireblade uses Tokico brakes.

In terms of assistance systems, the Daytona has a quickshifter, while the Fireblade has advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS, electronically adjustable suspension, riding modes, traction control, and anti-wheelie.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. The Daytona has a rear tire width of 180 mm and a rear tire diameter of 17 inches, while the Fireblade has a rear tire width of 190 mm and a rear tire diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is 1375 mm for the Daytona and 1405 mm for the Fireblade. The seat height is 830 mm for the Daytona and 832 mm for the Fireblade. The kerb weight with ABS is 184 kg for the Daytona and 196 kg for the Fireblade. The fuel tank capacity is 17.4 l for the Daytona and 16 l for the Fireblade.

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

In terms of strengths, the Daytona has a dream chassis, extremely solid brakes, a strong engine, a reprogrammed automatic gearshift, and disengageable ABS. On the other hand, the Fireblade has good brakes, low weight and nimble handling, an engine with plenty of power from the rev range, and high build quality.

In terms of weaknesses, the Daytona's main weakness is its high price. The Fireblade, on the other hand, lacks a shift assistant, has a sluggish and imprecise throttle grip, and its chassis may not be precise enough for peak performance on long straights.

Overall, the Triumph Daytona 675 R 2013 and the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017 have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Daytona offers a solid package with a strong engine and excellent brakes, while the Fireblade provides good brakes, nimble handling, and high build quality. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Daytona 675 R 2013 compared to Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2013
Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore76 mmBore76 mm
StrokeStroke49.6 mmStroke55 mm
Engine powerEngine power128 HPEngine power192 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power12,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpm
TorqueTorque74 NmTorque114 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque11,900 rpmRpm at Torque11,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.6 Compression Ratio13
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement675 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial, Monoblock
BrandBrandBremboBrandTokico

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsQuickshifterAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Suspension electronically adjustable, Riding modes, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,045 mmLength2,065 mm
WidthWidth695 mmWidth720 mm
HeightHeight1,112 mmHeight1,125 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,375 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height832 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)184 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)196 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.4 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2013

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2013

Apart from the fact that the Triumph causes a lot of costs in case of an unintentional line correction up to the 0-degree position, it brings along everything you need at the ring.

Dream chassis

extremely solid brakes

strong engine

reprogrammed automatic gearshift

disengageable ABS.

High price.

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

A worthy new edition from Honda. Even if it doesn't quite shine as brightly in the standard version as it does with the Öhlins Gold in the "SP" version, the Fireblade is a much better bike in 2017. The electronics package is good, the handling great and the seating position very good. The bike looks like a unified whole and will make Honda fans happy.

Good brakes

Low weight and nimble handling

Engine has plenty of power from the rev range

High build quality

No shift assistant

sluggish and not very precise throttle grip

chassis "nice" on the racetrack but not good enough to precisely set the scene for the great handling

disadvantages at peak performance on long straights

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Daytona 675 R vs Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Daytona 675 R 2013 and a Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Daytona 675 R with 64 days compared to 112 days for a Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade. Since model year 2011 1000PS.de editors have written 15 reviews for the Triumph Daytona 675 R and 71 reviews for the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade since model year 2005. The first review for the Triumph Daytona 675 R was published on 01/11/2010 and now has more than 11,000 views. This compares to more than 3,700 views for the first review on Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade published on 25/11/2003.

Price Triumph Daytona 675 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH