Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 vs. SWM SM 125 R 2017

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

SWM SM 125 R 2017

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 vs SWM SM 125 R 2017

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

SWM SM 125 R 2017

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 compared to SWM SM 125 R 2017

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010
SWM SM 125 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore97 mmBore58 mm
StrokeStroke67.8 mmStroke47.2 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.9 Compression Ratio12.8
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement501 ccmDisplacement124.7 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,445 mmWheelbase1,485 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height920 mmSeat Height913 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight120.5 kgDry Weight117 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

SWM SM 125 R 2017

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Inexpensive 125cc with a very smart and sporty design.

Price

Optics

Brake

Chassis

Cold running behaviour: Tyres

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH