Husaberg TE 125 2013 vs. SWM RS 125 R 2017

Husaberg TE 125 2013

Husaberg TE 125 2013

SWM RS 125 R 2017

SWM RS 125 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - Husaberg TE 125 2013 vs SWM RS 125 R 2017

Husaberg TE 125 2013

Husaberg TE 125 2013

SWM RS 125 R 2017

SWM RS 125 R 2017

Technical Specifications Husaberg TE 125 2013 compared to SWM RS 125 R 2017

Husaberg TE 125 2013
SWM RS 125 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore58 mm
StrokeStroke54.5 mmStroke47.2 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124.8 ccmDisplacement124.7 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,471 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height960 mmSeat Height920 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight95 kgDry Weight117 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity10.7 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH