Kawasaki ER-6n 2012 vs. Honda CBF 600 S 2008

Kawasaki ER-6n 2012

Kawasaki ER-6n 2012

Honda CBF 600 S 2008

Honda CBF 600 S 2008

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki ER-6n 2012 vs Honda CBF 600 S 2008

Kawasaki ER-6n 2012

Kawasaki ER-6n 2012

Honda CBF 600 S 2008

Honda CBF 600 S 2008

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2012 compared to Honda CBF 600 S 2008

Kawasaki ER-6n 2012
Honda CBF 600 S 2008

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power72 HPEngine power78 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingAir
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement599 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,480 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height805 mmSeat Height770 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity19 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6n 2012

Kawasaki ER-6n 2012

The engine is hearty and a lot of fun, plus the ER shines with a Japanese meticulous finish and a fighting price.

Solid handling

high quality level

weak brake

Honda CBF 600 S 2008

Honda CBF 600 S 2008

The Honda CBF600 S ABS is a prime example of functional motorcycling. It is not characterised by extremes, but by confidence, reliability and long-term satisfaction. A bike that has left its mark on generations of riders.

Very good-natured and confidence-inspiring riding performance

high suitability for everyday use

low fuel consumption and long range

durable and reliable engine

beginner-friendly ergonomics

effective ABS

uncomplicated technology

Low-emotion driving experience

little sporty dynamics

restrained character

low technical sophistication by today's standards

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs Honda CBF 600 S

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CBF 600 S

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons