BMW R nineT 2017 vs. KTM 200 Duke 2015

BMW R nineT 2017

BMW R nineT 2017

KTM 200 Duke 2015

KTM 200 Duke 2015

Loading...

Overview - BMW R nineT 2017 vs KTM 200 Duke 2015

BMW R nineT 2017

BMW R nineT 2017

KTM 200 Duke 2015

KTM 200 Duke 2015

Technical Specifications BMW R nineT 2017 compared to KTM 200 Duke 2015

BMW R nineT 2017
KTM 200 Duke 2015

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore101 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke73 mmStroke49 mm
Engine powerEngine power110 HPEngine power26 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque116 NmTorque19.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.5
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeToughened, DryClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement1,170 ccmDisplacement199.5 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTubular, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,487 mmWheelbase1,367 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height803 mmSeat Height800 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)222 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)129.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW R nineT 2017

BMW R nineT 2017

What more can be said about the BMW R nineT? Since its release in 2014, it has been a real perennial favourite in the customising scene and also at BMW itself. Its ingredients, however, are of very high quality and explain why the result is so coherent. The boxer engine, full of character, is a real joy every time you pull the throttle and, thanks to the wonderful sound, it never gets boring in the long run. Despite the relatively high weight, the BMW is pleasant to ride thanks to the high-quality chassis and finds a balanced mixture between cruiser and sporty naked bike. The look is of course a matter of taste, but the sales figures suggest that BMW must have done something right. And even if you don't like the standard look, accessories are a dime a dozen.

Boxer engine full of character

powerful pressure from low revs

comfortable seating position

extensive equipment

large accessories market

cool look

Footrest position when manoeuvring

Passenger ride comfort

Price

KTM 200 Duke 2015

KTM 200 Duke 2015

The first step towards a real motorbike. 10 hp more than the 125 is no small thing, but for us Central Europeans it's not really an issue. Because the 200 is not sold here. 16-year-olds and B-111 riders are only allowed to ride the 125, up-and-comers go straight for the 390 Duke, so there's no room for the 200, which only sells well in other countries far beyond our national borders.

Significantly stronger than the 125

used in the wheelie school

Not available in our countries

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R nineT vs KTM 200 Duke

Price BMW R nineT

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 200 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH