SWM SM 125 R 2020 vs. Husqvarna TE 125 2016

SWM SM 125 R 2020

SWM SM 125 R 2020

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Loading...

Overview - SWM SM 125 R 2020 vs Husqvarna TE 125 2016

SWM SM 125 R 2020

SWM SM 125 R 2020

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Technical Specifications SWM SM 125 R 2020 compared to Husqvarna TE 125 2016

SWM SM 125 R 2020
Husqvarna TE 125 2016
Show all
Same only
Differences
SWM SM 125 R 2020
SWM SM 125 R 2020
Husqvarna TE 125 2016
Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,500 mmWheelbase1,471 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height914 mmSeat Height960 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

SWM SM 125 R 2020

SWM SM 125 R 2020

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

The beginner enduro for riders who want to do everything right from the start. Does not forgive shifting errors and always wants to be ridden in the right rev range. In 2017, the 125 was made even lighter - dry, the 125 weighs just 92 kg.

cheapest model

easy handling

best learning effect

Less forgiving of mistakes

limited engine power

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHMotorex AGSchuberth