Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs. Husqvarna TE 300 2016
Husaberg TE 300 2012
Husqvarna TE 300 2016
Overview - Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs Husqvarna TE 300 2016
The Husaberg TE 300 2012 and the Husqvarna TE 300 2016 are both enduro motorcycles with similar technical specifications. They both have a bore and stroke of 72 mm, an electric and kick starter, a chain transmission, a single cylinder engine, and a displacement of 293.2 ccm. The front suspension is an upside-down telescopic fork from WP, and the rear suspension is also from WP. The frame is made of steel and has a central tube design. They both have a front tire diameter of 21 inches, a rear tire width of 140 mm, a rear tire diameter of 18 inches, a wheelbase of around 1475-1482 mm, a seat height of 960-985 mm, a dry weight of 103-104.6 kg, and a fuel tank capacity of 11 liters.
The Husaberg TE 300 2012 has the advantage of a very wide range of applications, making it suitable for various types of terrain and riding conditions. It also features simple but solid two-stroke technology, which can be easier to maintain and repair compared to more complex four-stroke engines. However, it does not have any specific weaknesses mentioned.
Husaberg TE 300 2012
On the other hand, the Husqvarna TE 300 2016 has several strengths. It is much quieter than the Husaberg TE 300 2012 due to the inclusion of a balancer shaft, which reduces engine vibrations and noise. It also has a powerful engine, providing ample performance for off-road riding. Additionally, it is praised for having the best balance of weight and performance, indicating that it offers a good combination of agility and power.
Husqvarna TE 300 2016
However, one weakness mentioned for the Husqvarna TE 300 2016 is a personal preference for a four-stroke engine on smooth and easy tracks. This suggests that the rider may feel that the two-stroke engine of the Husqvarna TE 300 2016 may not provide the same level of smoothness and ease of use in certain situations.
In summary, both the Husaberg TE 300 2012 and the Husqvarna TE 300 2016 have similar technical specifications and are capable enduro motorcycles. The Husaberg TE 300 2012 is praised for its wide range of applications and simple two-stroke technology, while the Husqvarna TE 300 2016 is commended for its quietness, powerful engine, and balanced weight and performance. However, personal preferences may lead some riders to prefer a four-stroke engine for certain types of tracks.
Technical Specifications Husaberg TE 300 2012 compared to Husqvarna TE 300 2016
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Husaberg TE 300 2012
The TE 300 was and remains a favourite, even in the new generation. Whether it's a special stage, narrow forest trials or endless steep slope climbs, the TE300 is never out of place. Simply a bike with which you can't go wrong.
Husqvarna TE 300 2016
Completely new engine for 2017! Lighter and quieter thanks to the balancer shaft, the two-stroke has also been lightened, with the 300 now weighing in at 102 kg. The choice for Erzberg, Romaniacs and Co!
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husaberg TE 300 vs Husqvarna TE 300
There are a few key differences between a Husaberg TE 300 2012 and a Husqvarna TE 300 2016. It takes less time to sell a Husaberg TE 300 with 41 days compared to 76 days for a Husqvarna TE 300. Since model year 2011 1000PS.de editors have written 2 reviews for the Husaberg TE 300 and 6 reviews for the Husqvarna TE 300 since model year 2014. The first review for the Husaberg TE 300 was published on 07/07/2010 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 6,800 views for the first review on Husqvarna TE 300 published on 03/11/2013.
