Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 vs. Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 vs Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 and the Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 are both naked bikes with similar engine power, but they have some notable differences in terms of specifications and performance.

Starting with the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014, it is equipped with a 675cc three-cylinder engine that produces 106 horsepower and 68 Nm of torque. The engine is liquid-cooled, providing efficient cooling for optimal performance. The bike features an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension, which helps improve handling and stability. The frame type is a Twin Tube, contributing to the bike's overall stability. The front and rear tyres have a width of 120mm and a diameter of 17 inches, respectively. The wheelbase is 1410mm, providing a good balance between maneuverability and stability. The seat height is 800mm, making it suitable for riders of various heights. The bike weighs 183kg and has a fuel tank capacity of 17.4 liters.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

On the other hand, the Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 is equipped with a larger 779cc four-cylinder engine that also produces 106 horsepower, but with a higher torque of 82 Nm. The engine is also liquid-cooled for efficient performance. The front suspension is an upside-down telescopic fork, similar to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R. However, the frame type is a Deltabox, which may provide a different feel and handling characteristics compared to the Twin Tube frame of the Triumph. The front and rear tyres have the same specifications as the Street Triple, with a width of 120mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is slightly longer at 1460mm, which may contribute to increased stability at higher speeds. The seat height is 815mm, slightly higher than the Triumph. The Yamaha FZ-8N weighs 211kg and has a fuel tank capacity of 17 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R is praised for its easy handling, rev-happy engine, and wonderful three-cylinder sound. It also has powerful brakes and a cool streetfighter look. On the other hand, the Yamaha FZ-8N is known for its stability and relatively universal chassis. It also offers a wide range of accessories and acceptable performance.

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Triumph Street Triple 675 R has a hard chassis that may compromise comfort, and its engine is considered a little weak at the bottom end. Over time, the bike can become quite loud, and the brakes may not be entirely suitable for beginners. The Yamaha FZ-8N has a footrest detent insert that sets too early, causing unsteadiness in the chassis and scraping on the ground. It also has an unattractive exhaust and can feel a bit cumbersome.

In conclusion, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 and the Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 are both capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Triumph offers easy handling and a unique sound, while the Yamaha provides stability and a wide range of accessories. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 compared to Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014
Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore74 mmBore68 mm
StrokeStroke52.3 mmStroke53.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power106 HPEngine power106 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,850 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque68 NmTorque82 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,750 rpmRpm at Torque8,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement675 ccmDisplacement779 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDeltabox

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,055 mmLength2,140 mm
WidthWidth740 mmWidth770 mm
HeightHeight1,060 mmHeight1,065 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight183 kgKerb Weight211 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.4 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Every motorcyclist will love the Street Triple R. It was built by enthusiasts. It was built by enthusiasts and conveys the pure pleasure of riding a motorbike without being too demanding.

Extremely easy to handle

rev-happy engine

wonderful three-cylinder sound

brute brakes

cool streetfighter look.

Hard chassis with modest comfort

engine a little weak at the bottom

quite loud over time

brakes not entirely suitable for beginners.

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

But as in life, you can't demonise the "approximate 3/4 litre" concept of the FZ-8 by quickly leafing through the data sheets. That would be a shame, because the 8 has given us a lot of pleasure in the 3,200 kilometres we have covered so far. Contrary to the facts, the 800 is probably the best choice for the average ambitious rider.

Stable and stable

chassis relatively universal

large variety of accessories

acceptable performance

Footrest detent insert sets too early and brings unsteadiness into the chassis - as well as scraping on the ground

ugly exhaust

a bit cumbersome

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R vs Yamaha FZ-8N

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 and a Yamaha FZ-8N 2011. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 675 R with 60 days compared to 70 days for a Yamaha FZ-8N. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R and 11 reviews for the Yamaha FZ-8N since model year 2010. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R was published on 20/07/2008 and now has more than 13,000 views. This compares to more than 8,200 views for the first review on Yamaha FZ-8N published on 27/01/2010.

Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha FZ-8N

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH