Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs. Yamaha MT-10 2017

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs Yamaha MT-10 2017

The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Yamaha MT-10 2017 are both powerful naked bikes with similar engine types, in-line configurations, and liquid cooling systems. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-10 2017 takes the lead with 160 HP compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011's 132 HP. The Yamaha also has a slightly higher torque at 111 Nm compared to the Triumph's 110 Nm. This means that the Yamaha offers more raw power and acceleration, making it more suitable for riders who enjoy high-speed performance.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension, which provide excellent handling and stability. The chassis of the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 is made of aluminum and has a twin tube frame, while the Yamaha MT-10 2017 has an aluminum frame with a Deltabox design. The Deltabox frame offers superior rigidity and balance, enhancing the overall handling and maneuverability of the Yamaha.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the two bikes have similar front and rear tire widths and diameters. The Triumph has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1437 mm compared to the Yamaha's 1400 mm. However, the seat height of the Yamaha is slightly lower at 825 mm compared to the Triumph's 828 mm. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of around 17 liters, providing a decent range for long rides.

When it comes to strengths, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 is known for its controlled chassis, hard sound, and stability. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-10 2017 offers a great sound, pleasant wind protection, comfortable seating position even on long tours, great engine response, and a balanced overall package despite its radical looks and wicked sound.

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 2017

In terms of weaknesses, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 has been noted to have rough gearing at times, which can disrupt the harmony between the rider and the machine. The Yamaha MT-10 2017, on the other hand, has a seating position that may feel too inactive on the racetrack. Additionally, while the Yamaha's chassis and ride assistance systems are sufficient for trackdays, they may not be on the same level as other Powernakeds.

In conclusion, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Yamaha MT-10 2017 are powerful naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha offers more power and a more balanced overall package, while the Triumph provides a controlled chassis and a hard sound. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 compared to Yamaha MT-10 2017

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Yamaha MT-10 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke50.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power132 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,500 rpm
TorqueTorque110 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement998 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDeltabox

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,086 mmLength2,095 mm
WidthWidth728 mmWidth800 mm
HeightHeight1,120 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,437 mmWheelbase1,400 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height828 mmSeat Height825 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Even a Super Duke is in a tight spot when the bends are not too sharp and the KTM can make full use of its radical handling and its unrivalled ability to correct the radius on naked bikes. The Speed Triple is more harmonious, patient and predictable. The Duke has to be beaten, the Triple can also be stroked.

Controlled chassis

hard sound

stable.

Rough gearing sometimes disturbs the idyll between man and machine.

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 2017

The Yamaha MT-10 exudes a lot of emotion with the cool CP4 engine, but also doesn't forget pragmatic utility. For a naked bike, it offers a lot of comfort on long tours. It rides fast but is still refined at all times. On the racetrack, the chassis is not precise enough to beat the other Powernakeds. Overall, however, it scores with its versatility paired with radical looks and awesome sound.

great sound

pleasant wind protection

comfortable seating position even on long tours

great engine response

balanced overall package despite radical looks and wicked sound

Too inactive seating position on the racetrack

chassis and ride assistance systems sufficient for trackdays but not on the same level as the other Powernakeds.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Yamaha MT-10

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and a Yamaha MT-10 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-10 2017 is about 60% higher. A Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 experiences a loss of 720 GBP in one year and 840 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1,010 GBP and 1,700 GBP for a Yamaha MT-10 2017. Compared to Yamaha MT-10 2017 there are less Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 6 compared to 12. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 77 days compared to 143 days for a Yamaha MT-10. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 32 reviews for the Yamaha MT-10 since model year 2016. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 02/10/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 20,700 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-10 published on 17/11/2015.

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-10

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH