Kawasaki ER-6n 2016 vs. Honda NC750X 2014

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Honda NC750X 2014
Loading...
Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2016 compared to Honda NC750X 2014
Kawasaki ER-6n 2016
Honda NC750X 2014
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 83 mm | Bore | 77 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 60 mm | Stroke | 80 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 72 HP | Engine power | 55 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 8,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 6,250 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 64 Nm | Torque | 68 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 7,000 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 4,750 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 10.8 | Compression Ratio | 10.7 |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Ignition | Ignition | Digital | Ignition | Digital, Transistor |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 2 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Valves per cylinder | Valves per cylinder | 4 | Valves per cylinder | 4 |
Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | DOHC |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 649 ccm | Displacement | 745 ccm |
Suspension Rear
Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Monoshock | Shock absorber | Monoshock |
---|
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Steel |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Perimeter | Frame type | Twin Tube, Tubular |
Brakes Front
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Double piston |
---|
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Single piston | Piston | Single piston |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 160 mm | Rear tyre width | 160 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 60 % | Rear tyre height | 60 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,110 mm | Length | 2,210 mm |
Width | Width | 770 mm | Width | 840 mm |
Height | Height | 1,110 mm | Height | 1,285 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,410 mm | Wheelbase | 1,540 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 805 mm | Seat Height | 830 mm |
Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 208 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 219 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 16 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 14.1 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

The engine is hearty and a lot of fun, plus the ER shines with a Japanese meticulous finish and a fighting price.
Solid handling
high quality level
weak brake
Honda NC750X 2014

The NC750X with conventional manual transmission is certainly a good bike with ingeniously practical gimmicks like the spacious compartment in place of the tank.
Solid workmanship
rustic look
upright seating position
padded saddle
smooth braking system.
High competition
relatively expensive.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs Honda NC750X
Price Kawasaki ER-6n
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Honda NC750X
Model year
Current average market prices