Magazine
Brands
Top Awards
Compare
About us
Home
Husqvarna TE 310 2009 vs. SWM RS 300 R 2016
Husqvarna TE 310 2009
SWM RS 300 R 2016
Loading...
Overview - Husqvarna TE 310 2009 vs SWM RS 300 R 2016
Husqvarna TE 310 2009
SWM RS 300 R 2016
Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 310 2009 compared to SWM RS 300 R 2016
Husqvarna TE 310 2009
SWM RS 300 R 2016
Show all
Same only
Differences
Husqvarna TE 310 2009
SWM RS 300 R 2016
Engine and Drive Train
Bore
Bore
83 mm
Bore
83 mm
Stroke
Stroke
55 mm
Stroke
55 mm
Starter
Starter
Electric, Kick
Starter
Electric
Cooling
Cooling
liquid
Cooling
liquid
Displacement
Displacement
297 ccm
Displacement
298 ccm
Suspension Front
Brand
Brand
Sachs
Brand
Kayaba
Suspension Rear
Brand
Brand
Sachs
Brand
Kayaba
Brakes Rear
Type
Type
Disc
Type
Disc
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre diameter
Front tyre diameter
21 inch
Front tyre diameter
21 inch
Rear tyre diameter
Rear tyre diameter
18 inch
Rear tyre diameter
18 inch
Wheelbase
Wheelbase
1,495 mm
Wheelbase
1,495 mm
Seat Height
Seat Height
963 mm
Seat Height
963 mm
Dry Weight
Dry Weight
107 kg
Dry Weight
107 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity
Fuel Tank Capacity
7.2 l
Fuel Tank Capacity
7.2 l
Alternative Comparisons
VS.
Husqvarna TE 310 2010 vs
Husqvarna FE 350 2016
VS.
Husqvarna TE 310 2009 vs
Husqvarna FE 350 2019
VS.
Yamaha WR250F 2021 vs
SWM RS 300 R 2018
VS.
Husqvarna TE 450 2008 vs
Husqvarna TE 310 2009
VS.
SWM RS 300 R 2022 vs
SWM RS 500 R 2020
VS.
SWM RS 300 R 2022 vs
SWM RS 500 R 2022
VS.
Husqvarna TE 310 2013
SWM RS 300 R 2016 vs
Husqvarna TE 310 2013
VS.
Yamaha WR250F 2018 vs
SWM RS 300 R 2018
VS.
SWM RS 300 R 2022 vs
SWM SM 500 R 2020
VS.
Husqvarna SMR 510 2006 vs
SWM RS 300 R 2018
VS.
Husqvarna TE 310 2011 vs
KTM Freeride 250 F 2020
VS.
Husqvarna TE 310 2009 vs
KTM 450 EXC-F Sixdays 2018
VS.
SWM RS 300 R 2022 vs
Husqvarna FE 350 2022