Kawasaki Z 800 2016 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2007

Kawasaki Z 800 2016

Kawasaki Z 800 2016

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2007

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2007

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z 800 2016 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2007

Kawasaki Z 800 2016
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2007

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power113 HPEngine power130 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement806 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,445 mmWheelbase1,429 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height834 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z 800 2016

Kawasaki Z 800 2016

Overall, the Z800 delivered a sensational performance. Considering the fact that nothing was changed or optimised on the vehicle apart from the Remus rear silencer, a super final result.

Eye-catching, chunky look

confident acceleration

relaxed geometry

powerful brakes

Limited freedom of movement for the legs.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2007

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2007

Euphoria spread through the long bends. The Triple is a bit more expensive than some Nippon Nakeds with cheap chassis and you can feel it. It remains stable, you can open the throttle hard and you hit the line exactly.

More power

increased torque

reduced weight

agility

greatly improved geometry

precise and fast.

>100kg people might have space problems.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z 800 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Price Kawasaki Z 800

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH