BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs. BMW S 1000 RR 2012

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs BMW S 1000 RR 2012

The BMW S 1000 R model year 2015 and the BMW S 1000 RR model year 2012 are both powerful motorcycles from BMW, but they have some notable differences.

In terms of engine specifications, both models have an inline four-cylinder engine with the same bore and stroke measurements of 80 mm and 49.7 mm, respectively. However, the S 1000 R has a slightly lower engine power of 160 HP compared to the S 1000 RR's 192 HP. Both models have the same torque of 112 Nm and a displacement of 999cc. The compression ratio of the S 1000 R is 12, while the S 1000 RR has a higher compression ratio of 13.

Both motorcycles feature a swing arm rear suspension and a twin tube aluminum frame. The S 1000 R has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension, while the S 1000 RR has a telescopic fork front suspension. The front brakes on both models are double disk with four pistons and radial technology.

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

In terms of dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have the same front and rear tire width and diameter, with a wheelbase of around 1430-1440 mm. The seat height of the S 1000 R is slightly lower at 814 mm compared to the S 1000 RR's 820 mm. Both models have a kerb weight of 207 kg and a fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters.

Now, let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each model. The BMW S 1000 R 2015 has a powerful and well-controllable engine, making it a thrilling ride. It also has a powerful braking system, providing excellent stopping power. Additionally, the S 1000 R offers a comparatively comfortable seating position, allowing for longer rides without discomfort.

On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 has a complete electronic equipment package, offering advanced features and technology. It also has a good braking system, ensuring reliable stopping power. The S 1000 RR is known for its strong engine and is extremely fast on the road. Furthermore, it has an appropriate appearance, appealing to riders who value style.

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

However, the S 1000 R 2015 has some weaknesses to consider. It offers optional extras that are expensive, making it less accessible for some riders. The chassis of the S 1000 R is also hard, which may impact comfort on rough roads. Additionally, there have been reports of vibrations in the handlebars, which could be a concern for some riders.

Similarly, the S 1000 RR 2012 has a weakness in its chassis, which is somewhat complicated and takes time to get used to. This may require additional effort and adjustment from the rider to fully enjoy the motorcycle's capabilities.

In conclusion, both the BMW S 1000 R 2015 and the BMW S 1000 RR 2012 offer powerful performance and advanced features. The S 1000 R prioritizes comfort and controllability, while the S 1000 RR focuses on speed and electronic equipment. Riders should consider their preferences and priorities to choose the model that best suits their needs.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2015 compared to BMW S 1000 RR 2012

BMW S 1000 R 2015
BMW S 1000 RR 2012

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power192 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio13
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,056 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth826 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,432 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height820 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2015

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comparatively comfortable seating position.

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

vibrations in the handlebars

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

BMW S 1000 RR 2012

What remains is fascination, bewilderment and fear. You can't shake the uneasy feeling that you're not quite yourself on this bike. It feels like a heavy metal concert with earplugs.

Complete, electronic equipment

good braking system

strong engine

extremely fast on the road

appropriate appearance.

Chassis somewhat complicated and takes a lot of getting used to.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs BMW S 1000 RR

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2015 and a BMW S 1000 RR 2012. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 RR 2012 is about 12% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2015 experiences a loss of 260 GBP in one year and 610 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 300 GBP and 430 GBP for a BMW S 1000 RR 2012. Compared to BMW S 1000 RR 2012 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2015 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 12 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 61 days compared to 64 days for a BMW S 1000 RR. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 135 reviews for the BMW S 1000 RR since model year 2010. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 4,000 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 RR published on 16/04/2008.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH