Suzuki GSR 600 2006 vs. Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Suzuki GSR 600 2006

Suzuki GSR 600 2006

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki GSR 600 2006 vs Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Suzuki GSR 600 2006

Suzuki GSR 600 2006

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSR 600 2006 compared to Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Suzuki GSR 600 2006
Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power98 HPEngine power95 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement599 ccmDisplacement799 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,400 mmWheelbase1,555 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height830 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity19 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSR 600 2006

Suzuki GSR 600 2006

The naked Suzuki has not been spared in any neuralgic areas. On the road, you enjoy the high-quality engine and chassis. It is super agile in tight corners and fast and stable in wide radii.

Rev-hungry engine

stable and lively at the same time

excellent overall package

clearly lacks wind protection

USD fork would suit it well.

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

It seems Triumph has built a motorbike that has made the most pronounced trait in wildcats - suppleness - the overriding principle of its dynamics. The Tiger is elegant, controlled and deliberate in the use of its power.

Homogeneous power development

smooth ride

loud sound

ABS.

Gearbox somewhat stiff during lively gear changes.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSR 600 vs Triumph Tiger 800

Price Suzuki GSR 600

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Tiger 800

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH