KTM 625 SXC 2005 vs. Husqvarna SM 610 2005

KTM 625 SXC 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005
Loading...
Overview - KTM 625 SXC 2005 vs Husqvarna SM 610 2005

KTM 625 SXC 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005
Technical Specifications KTM 625 SXC 2005 compared to Husqvarna SM 610 2005
KTM 625 SXC 2005
Husqvarna SM 610 2005
Engine and Drive Train
Engine power | Engine power | 31 HP | Engine power | 60 HP |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 1 | Cylinders | 1 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 625 ccm | Displacement | 576 ccm |
Dimensions and Weights
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,510 mm | Wheelbase | 1,500 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seat Height | Seat Height | 940 mm | Seat Height | 920 mm |
Dry Weight | Dry Weight | 139 kg | Dry Weight | 140 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 9.2 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 12.5 l |
Top Speed | Top Speed | 145 km/h | Top Speed | 160 km/h |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A2 | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
KTM 625 SXC 2005

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Husqvarna SM 610 2005

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!
Optimal chassis
independent geometry
linear steering feel
high-quality fork
qualitative workmanship.
Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply
high price
not suitable for long-distance travel
spare parts supply problematic.