Yamaha MT-09 2016 vs. KTM 690 Duke R 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

KTM 690 Duke R 2013

KTM 690 Duke R 2013

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2016 vs KTM 690 Duke R 2013

The Yamaha MT-09 2016 and the KTM 690 Duke R 2013 are both naked bikes with their own unique features and strengths. The Yamaha MT-09 2016 is equipped with a powerful three-cylinder engine that delivers 115 horsepower and 87.5 Nm of torque. In comparison, the KTM 690 Duke R 2013 has a single-cylinder engine that produces 70 horsepower and 70 Nm of torque.

One of the key advantages of the Yamaha MT-09 2016 is its fully adjustable chassis, allowing riders to customize their riding experience to their preferences. Additionally, the bike offers three power modes, providing versatility for different riding conditions. The quickshifter, which comes as standard, allows for seamless gear changes. The sporty upright seating position of the MT-09 2016 offers comfort and control, and the bike also features good brakes and traction control. Its aggressive looks make it visually appealing.

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

On the other hand, the KTM 690 Duke R 2013 boasts monobloc brakes, which provide excellent stopping power and control. The Akrapovic exhaust system enhances the bike's performance and produces a distinctive sound. The KTM also features high-quality WP suspension elements, ensuring a smooth and comfortable ride. Another advantage of the KTM 690 Duke R 2013 is its higher lean angle clearance, allowing for more aggressive cornering.

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a saddle that may be too hard for long tours, which could potentially affect rider comfort. Additionally, the licence plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection compared to a conventional one.

KTM 690 Duke R 2013

KTM 690 Duke R 2013

On the other hand, the KTM 690 Duke R 2013 lacks comfort and weather protection. The bike's design prioritizes performance and agility, which may result in a less comfortable riding experience, especially on longer journeys. Furthermore, the lack of weather protection means that riders may be more exposed to the elements.

In conclusion, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 and the KTM 690 Duke R 2013 are both powerful naked bikes with their own unique features and strengths. The Yamaha offers a powerful three-cylinder engine, adjustable chassis, and various riding modes, while the KTM boasts monobloc brakes, an Akrapovic exhaust, and high-quality suspension elements. However, both bikes have their weaknesses, such as comfort issues and lack of weather protection. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2016 compared to KTM 690 Duke R 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2016
KTM 690 Duke R 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore78 mmBore102 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke84.5 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power70 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque70 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque5,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio12.6
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesRocker arm, OHC
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement690 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTubular

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,466 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height865 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight188 kgKerb Weight149.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

The Yamaha MT-09 did not need to be reinvented for the coming season - it already was extremely well done almost four years ago. Instead, the Japanese focus on fine-tuning and adding practical, contemporary gimmicks such as traction control and automatic shifting. Due to the Euro4 standard, however, the engine management has been changed once again and offers an emphatically powerful but well controllable power delivery in standard mode; the power explosion of the first generation is now no longer offered even by the sharper A mode. The biggest change, recognisable at first glance, is the, in my opinion, extremely successful design with the more aggressive front and the newly designed rear. All in all, an even snazzier naked bike that was clearly built for the fun of motorcycling.

Wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant

three power modes

fully adjustable chassis

quickshifter as standard

sporty upright seating position

good brakes

aggressive looks

traction control.

Saddle a little too hard for long tours

licence plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one

KTM 690 Duke R 2013

KTM 690 Duke R 2013

That the KTM 690 Duke R is the better motorbike is clear just from looking at the two machines from the outside. The Akrapovic exhaust and the WP suspension elements simply work and sound better.

Monobloc brakes

Akrapovic exhaust

WP suspension elements

higher lean angle clearance.

Lack of comfort

no weather protection

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs KTM 690 Duke R

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-09 2016 and a KTM 690 Duke R 2013. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 11. It takes less time to sell a KTM 690 Duke R with 65 days compared to 87 days for the Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 and 9 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke R since model year 2010. The first review for the Yamaha MT-09 was published on 10/06/2013 and now has more than 39,900 views. This compares to more than 23,900 views for the first review on KTM 690 Duke R published on 02/12/2009.

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 690 Duke R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH