Husqvarna FC 350 2015 vs. Beta RR 400 2009

Husqvarna FC 350 2015

Husqvarna FC 350 2015

Beta RR 400 2009

Beta RR 400 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna FC 350 2015 vs Beta RR 400 2009

Husqvarna FC 350 2015

Husqvarna FC 350 2015

Beta RR 400 2009

Beta RR 400 2009

Technical Specifications Husqvarna FC 350 2015 compared to Beta RR 400 2009

Husqvarna FC 350 2015
Beta RR 400 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore88 mmBore89 mm
StrokeStroke57.5 mmStroke64 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
DisplacementDisplacement349.7 ccmDisplacement398 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,500 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height992 mmSeat Height940 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight106.4 kgDry Weight117.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.5 lFuel Tank Capacity8.5 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna FC 350 vs Beta RR 400

Price Husqvarna FC 350

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Beta RR 400

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH