BMW G 310 R 2017 vs. Yamaha MT-03 2020

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

Yamaha MT-03 2020

Yamaha MT-03 2020

Loading...

Overview - BMW G 310 R 2017 vs Yamaha MT-03 2020

The BMW G 310 R 2017 and the Yamaha MT-03 2020 are both popular naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. While they have some similarities in terms of their technical specifications, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-03 2020 takes the lead with 42 HP compared to the BMW G 310 R 2017's 34 HP. This means that the Yamaha offers more power and acceleration, which can be appealing to riders looking for a more exhilarating experience. However, the BMW G 310 R still provides a smooth response and a throaty sound, adding to its overall appeal.

Both bikes have liquid-cooled engines and a displacement of around 300cc, ensuring efficient cooling and optimal performance. They also feature a monoshock rear suspension and a swing arm, providing stability and comfort during rides. The chassis of both bikes is made of steel, ensuring durability and strength.

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

When it comes to braking, both bikes feature a single disk front brake with ABS, ensuring safe and controlled stopping power. The Yamaha MT-03 2020 has a slightly smaller front brake diameter of 298 mm compared to the BMW G 310 R 2017's 300 mm, but this difference is unlikely to have a significant impact on performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha MT-03 2020 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1380 mm compared to the BMW G 310 R 2017's 1374 mm. The seat height of the Yamaha is also slightly lower at 780 mm compared to the BMW's 785 mm. Both bikes have similar front and rear tire dimensions, with the Yamaha having a slightly narrower rear tire width of 140 mm compared to the BMW's 150 mm.

One notable difference between the two bikes is the fuel tank capacity. The Yamaha MT-03 2020 has a larger fuel tank capacity of 14 liters compared to the BMW G 310 R 2017's 11 liters. This means that the Yamaha offers a longer range before needing to refuel, which can be advantageous for riders planning longer rides.

Yamaha MT-03 2020

Yamaha MT-03 2020

In terms of strengths, the BMW G 310 R 2017 offers a smooth response and a low seat height, making it accessible to a wide range of riders. It also has a visually appealing design and a throaty sound, adding to its overall appeal. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-03 2020 offers easily controlled power, a low seat height, and an easy-to-ride nature. It also boasts a low fuel consumption rate and a neatly readable LC display. Additionally, the Yamaha has an aggressive look that appeals to riders looking for a more visually striking bike.

However, both bikes also have their weaknesses. The BMW G 310 R 2017 has been criticized for having individual components that look cheap. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-03 2020 has been noted to have an acute knee angle for taller riders, a softer chassis compared to other Yamaha MT models, and may not necessarily be the most emotionally appealing motorbike.

In conclusion, the BMW G 310 R 2017 and the Yamaha MT-03 2020 are both solid choices for riders looking for a naked bike experience. While the Yamaha offers more power and a larger fuel tank capacity, the BMW provides a smooth response and a visually appealing design. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW G 310 R 2017 compared to Yamaha MT-03 2020

BMW G 310 R 2017
Yamaha MT-03 2020

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore68 mm
StrokeStroke62 mmStroke44.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power34 HPEngine power42 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,750 rpm
TorqueTorque28 NmTorque29.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.6 Compression Ratio11.2
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement313 ccmDisplacement321 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel140 mmTravel130 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel131 mmTravel125 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeSingle disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter298 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter240 mmDiameter220 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength1,988 mmLength2,090 mm
WidthWidth896 mmWidth745 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,374 mmWheelbase1,380 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height780 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)158.5 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)168 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

The BMW G 310 R scores with easy handling that should not overtax any beginner. The great responsiveness of the single cylinder makes it easy to control, and the low seat height gives a secure footing at traffic lights. For reasons of cost, savings were made in some corners, which unfortunately also becomes visible. In comparison, the workmanship is not on a par with the competition.

Smooth response

low seat height

pretty design

throaty sound

Individual components look cheap

Yamaha MT-03 2020

Yamaha MT-03 2020

The MT-03 remains Yamaha's most accessible and pragmatic Hyper Naked in the segment. It scores with its low seat height, the easily controllable power of the two-cylinder and at the same time offers enough comfort for commuters. What it may lack in sportiness, it makes up for in comfort, making it perfect for people looking for a well-functioning motorbike with a brutal look. However, you shouldn't be too big, and you shouldn't aspire to keep up with the other models in the MT range at the angle - because that's not what it was designed for. The 2020 model year is thus a coherent update that is sure to make its buyers happy.

Easily controlled power

low seat height

easy to ride

low fuel consumption

neatly readable LC display

aggressive look

acute knee angle for tall people

soft chassis compared to other Yamaha MT models

not necessarily the most emotional motorbike

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW G 310 R vs Yamaha MT-03

There are a few key differences between a BMW G 310 R 2017 and a Yamaha MT-03 2020. It takes less time to sell a BMW G 310 R with 75 days compared to 82 days for a Yamaha MT-03. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the BMW G 310 R and 8 reviews for the Yamaha MT-03 since model year 2006. The first review for the BMW G 310 R was published on 07/10/2015 and now has more than 28,500 views. This compares to more than 109,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-03 published on 15/12/2005.

Price BMW G 310 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-03

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH