Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha FZ-8N 2010

Yamaha FZ-8N 2010

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 vs Yamaha MT-09 2013

The Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 and the Yamaha MT-09 2013 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several differences between the two models that make each unique.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-09 2013 has the advantage with 115 HP compared to the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010's 106 HP. This extra power provides a more exhilarating ride and quicker acceleration. Additionally, the MT-09 has a higher torque of 87.5 Nm compared to the FZ-8N's 82 Nm, which further enhances its performance.

Another notable difference is the number of cylinders. The FZ-8N has a 4-cylinder engine, while the MT-09 has a 3-cylinder engine. This difference in cylinder configuration can affect the overall performance and sound of the bike.

In terms of suspension, the FZ-8N 2010 features an Upside-Down telescopic fork, while the MT-09 2013 has a telescopic fork. Both provide a comfortable and stable ride, but the Upside-Down fork on the FZ-8N may offer slightly better performance in terms of handling and stability.

Yamaha FZ-8N 2010

Yamaha FZ-8N 2010

When it comes to the chassis, the FZ-8N 2010 has a Deltabox frame type, while the MT-09 2013 has a Twin Tube frame type. Both frames are known for their strength and rigidity, but the Twin Tube frame on the MT-09 may offer better weight distribution and handling characteristics.

In terms of braking, both bikes feature double disk brakes on the front, providing excellent stopping power and control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the FZ-8N has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1460 mm compared to the MT-09's 1440 mm. Both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters, ensuring good traction and stability. The seat height is also the same at 815 mm.

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

However, there are some differences in weight and fuel tank capacity. The FZ-8N has a higher kerb weight of 211 kg compared to the MT-09's 188 kg. This difference in weight may affect maneuverability and agility. Additionally, the FZ-8N has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17 liters, while the MT-09 has a smaller capacity of 14 liters. This means that the FZ-8N may have a longer range before needing to refuel.

In terms of strengths, the FZ-8N 2010 offers a sporty engine performance, a beefy appearance, a pleasant driving feel, and is relatively fast. On the other hand, the MT-09 2013 is praised for its reasonable price and powerful engine.

However, there are also weaknesses to consider. The FZ-8N's exhaust canister is criticized for its negative visual appearance. Meanwhile, the MT-09 has a hard chassis, which may affect comfort, and a higher fuel consumption.

Overall, both the Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 and the Yamaha MT-09 2013 are impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The FZ-8N offers a sporty and fast ride with a beefy appearance, while the MT-09 provides a powerful engine at a reasonable price. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha FZ-8N 2010
Yamaha MT-09 2013
Show all
Same only
Differences
Yamaha FZ-8N 2010
Yamaha FZ-8N 2010
Yamaha MT-09 2013
Yamaha MT-09 2013

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,140 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth770 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight211 kgKerb Weight188 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha FZ-8N 2010

Yamaha FZ-8N 2010

Freely following the philosophical-optimistic view that the glass is not half empty but half full, at Yamaha you don't have to decide AGAINST two, but FOR one. In any case, the FZ8 has enough potential to become the golden mean in the circle of free-body bikes.

Sporty engine performance

beefy appearance

pleasant driving feel

relatively fast.

Exhaust canister convinces optically negative.

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

The start is frightening - abandonment of 1st gear.

Reasonable price

powerful engine

Hard chassis

high consumption

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha FZ-8N vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha FZ-8N 2010 and a Yamaha MT-09 2013. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 52 days compared to 57 days for the Yamaha FZ-8N. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 11 reviews for the Yamaha FZ-8N and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Yamaha FZ-8N was published on 27/01/2010 and now has more than 8,200 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 10/06/2013.

Price Yamaha FZ-8N

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISSchuberthcalimoto GmbHContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AG