Kawasaki ER-6n 2015 vs. Triumph Trident 660 2022

Kawasaki ER-6n 2015

Triumph Trident 660 2022
Loading...
Overview - Kawasaki ER-6n 2015 vs Triumph Trident 660 2022

Kawasaki ER-6n 2015

Triumph Trident 660 2022
Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2015 compared to Triumph Trident 660 2022
Kawasaki ER-6n 2015
Triumph Trident 660 2022
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 83 mm | Bore | 74 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 60 mm | Stroke | 51.1 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 72 HP | Engine power | 81 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 8,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 10,250 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 64 Nm | Torque | 64 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 7,000 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 6,250 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 10.8 | Compression Ratio | 11.95 |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 3 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Valves per cylinder | Valves per cylinder | 4 | Valves per cylinder | 4 |
Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | DOHC |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 649 ccm | Displacement | 660 ccm |
Suspension Rear
Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Monoshock | Shock absorber | Monoshock |
---|
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Steel |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Perimeter | Frame type | Perimeter |
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Double piston |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Single piston | Piston | Single piston |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 160 mm | Rear tyre width | 180 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 60 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Width | Width | 770 mm | Width | 795 mm |
Height | Height | 1,110 mm | Height | 1,089 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,410 mm | Wheelbase | 1,401 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 805 mm | Seat Height | 805 mm |
Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 208 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 189 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 16 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 14 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A2, A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Kawasaki ER-6n 2015

The engine is hearty and a lot of fun, plus the ER shines with a Japanese meticulous finish and a fighting price.
Solid handling
high quality level
weak brake
Triumph Trident 660 2022

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs Triumph Trident 660
Price Kawasaki ER-6n
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Triumph Trident 660
Model year
Current average market prices