Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2014 vs. Yamaha Aerox 2016

Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2014

Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2014

Yamaha Aerox 2016

Yamaha Aerox 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2014 compared to Yamaha Aerox 2016

Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2014
Yamaha Aerox 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power4.5 HPEngine power3.3 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,700 rpmRpm at Max. Power6,750 rpm
TorqueTorque4.3 NmTorque3.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeAutomaticTransmission TypeAutomatic
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
CoolingCoolingAirCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement49 ccmDisplacement49.3 ccm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDrumTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width100 mmFront tyre width130 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height60 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter10 inchFront tyre diameter13 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter10 inchRear tyre diameter13 inch
LengthLength1,700 mmLength1,870 mm
WidthWidth680 mmWidth700 mm
HeightHeight1,060 mmHeight1,155 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,200 mmWheelbase1,275 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height765 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight95 kgKerb Weight97 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.3 lFuel Tank Capacity7 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyAMLicense compliancyAM

Alternative Comparisons