Kawasaki ER-6f 2012 vs. Kawasaki Z 750 2010

Kawasaki ER-6f 2012

Kawasaki Z 750 2010
Loading...
Overview - Kawasaki ER-6f 2012 vs Kawasaki Z 750 2010

Kawasaki ER-6f 2012

Kawasaki Z 750 2010
Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6f 2012 compared to Kawasaki Z 750 2010
Kawasaki ER-6f 2012
Kawasaki Z 750 2010
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 83 mm | Bore | 68.4 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 60 mm | Stroke | 50.9 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 72 HP | Engine power | 106 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 8,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 10,500 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 64 Nm | Torque | 78 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 7,000 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 8,300 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 10.8 | Compression Ratio | 11.3 |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Ignition | Ignition | Digital | Ignition | Digital |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 4 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 649 ccm | Displacement | 748 ccm |
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Steel |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Perimeter | Frame type | Twin Tube |
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Double piston |
Shock mount | Shock mount | Semi-Schwimmsattel | Shock mount | Floating caliper |
Technology | Technology | Petal | Technology | Petal |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Single piston | Piston | Single piston |
Shock mount | Shock mount | Floating caliper | Shock mount | Floating caliper |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 160 mm | Rear tyre width | 180 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 60 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
Length | Length | 2,110 mm | Length | 2,085 mm |
Width | Width | 770 mm | Width | 805 mm |
Height | Height | 1,180 mm | Height | 1,100 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,410 mm | Wheelbase | 1,440 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 805 mm | Seat Height | 815 mm |
Kerb Weight | Kerb Weight | 209 kg | Kerb Weight | 226 kg |
Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 211 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 230 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 16 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 18.5 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Kawasaki ER-6f 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Kawasaki Z 750 2010

A good bike at a very good price, especially the upside-down fork is convincing.
improved torque curve
upside-down fork
aggressive engine
low price
high weight
4 hp less than the predecessor
not exactly effortless driving
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6f vs Kawasaki Z 750
Price Kawasaki ER-6f
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Kawasaki Z 750
Model year
Current average market prices