Husqvarna TE 310 2013 vs. Beta RR 390 2015

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Beta RR 390 2015

Beta RR 390 2015

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 310 2013 vs Beta RR 390 2015

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Husqvarna TE 310 2013

Beta RR 390 2015

Beta RR 390 2015

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 310 2013 compared to Beta RR 390 2015

Husqvarna TE 310 2013
Beta RR 390 2015

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore83 mmBore95 mm
StrokeStroke55 mmStroke56.2 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.9 Compression Ratio12.4
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement297 ccmDisplacement398 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,475 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height940 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight111 kgDry Weight113 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity8 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 310 vs Beta RR 390

Price Husqvarna TE 310

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Beta RR 390

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH