Yamaha MT-10 2022 vs. Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha MT-10 2022

Yamaha MT-10 2022

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-10 2022 vs Yamaha XSR900 2018

The Yamaha MT-10 2022 and the Yamaha XSR900 2018 are both naked bikes from Yamaha, but they have some notable differences in terms of technical specifications and strengths.

Starting with the engine and drivetrain, the Yamaha MT-10 2022 is equipped with an in-line, 4-cylinder engine that produces 166 HP of power and 112 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Yamaha XSR900 2018 features an in-line, 3-cylinder engine with 115 HP of power and 87.5 Nm of torque. The MT-10 has a higher power output, making it more suitable for riders who prefer a more powerful and thrilling riding experience.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. This setup provides good stability and handling for both models.

Yamaha MT-10 2022

Yamaha MT-10 2022

The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum, which offers a good balance between strength and weight. However, the frame type differs, with the MT-10 featuring a Deltabox frame and the XSR900 having a Twin Tube frame. The Deltabox frame is known for its rigidity and stability, while the Twin Tube frame provides a balance between rigidity and flexibility.

When it comes to brakes, both bikes have double disc brakes at the front. However, the MT-10 has larger diameter discs (320 mm) compared to the XSR900 (298 mm), which provides better braking performance and control for the MT-10.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the Yamaha MT-10 2022 offers a comprehensive package including ABS, riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, shift assistant with blipper, cruise control, traction control, and anti-wheelie. On the other hand, the Yamaha XSR900 2018 only has ABS.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha MT-10 2022 has a slightly smaller wheelbase (1405 mm) compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2018 (1440 mm). The seat height of the MT-10 is also slightly higher (835 mm) compared to the XSR900 (815 mm). However, the XSR900 has a smaller fuel tank capacity (14 l) compared to the MT-10 (17 l). The kerb weight of the MT-10 with ABS is slightly higher (212 kg) compared to the XSR900 (191 kg).

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 2018

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha MT-10 2022 is praised for its lovely CP4 engine, great electronics package, distinctive look, comfortable seating position, easy-to-read gauges, and cornering ABS. On the other hand, the Yamaha XSR900 2018 is known for its extremely sporty and rev-happy engine, excellent brakes, riding at naked bike level, pleasant seating position, high-quality workmanship, and price-performance ratio.

However, both bikes have some weaknesses. The Yamaha MT-10 2022 lacks an adjustable clutch lever and steel braided brake hoses, while the display is somewhat small. The Yamaha XSR900 2018 has an almost too direct response from the engine and the retro style is not thought through to the last detail.

In conclusion, the Yamaha MT-10 2022 and the Yamaha XSR900 2018 are both impressive naked bikes from Yamaha, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. The MT-10 offers a more powerful engine and a comprehensive electronics package, while the XSR900 provides a sporty engine and a good price-performance ratio. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-10 2022 compared to Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha MT-10 2022
Yamaha XSR900 2018

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power166 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.5
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement998 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel120 mmTravel137 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel120 mmTravel130 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDeltaboxFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake66 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail102 mmTrail103 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter298 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter245 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Cruise control, Traction control, Anti-wheelieAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,100 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth800 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,165 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,405 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)212 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)191 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-10 2022

Yamaha MT-10 2022

The new MT-10 is a really successful evolution of its predecessor, but remains completely true to its character. The new electronics package with a 6-axis IMU is a blast, all features are so well coordinated and work so well together that the rider is optimally supported by the electronics in every situation without being overbearingly patronised. The rest of the components in the chassis and brakes are completely in order and the Mad Max-Brachialo style look has been toned down a little in direct comparison to the predecessor, but still remains unique and clearly recognisable as an MT-10.

Lovely CP4 engine

great electronics package

distinctive look

comfortable seating position

easy-to-read gauges

cornering ABS.

Clutch lever not adjustable

no steel braided brake hoses

display somewhat small

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 2018

The Yamaha XSR900 is a classic optical illusion - with its round headlight, angular tank and attached tail light, it clearly passes for a retro bike. But it's no coincidence that the performance is reminiscent of the potent mid-range naked bike Yamaha MT-09, which is the extremely sporty basis for the XSR900. So the engine is a blast and the brakes are appropriately venomous. Fortunately, the engineers didn't overdo it with the chassis, the XSR900 offers sufficient comfort and the upright riding position is more comfortable than the powerful engine would lead one to expect. All in all, the XSR900 is one of the sportiest models among the retro bikes.

Extremely sporty and rev-happy engine

excellent brakes

riding at naked bike level

pleasant seating position

high-quality workmanship

price-performance ratio.

almost too direct response

retro style not thought through to the last detail

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-10 vs Yamaha XSR900

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-10 2022 and a Yamaha XSR900 2018. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-10 2022 is about 89% higher. A Yamaha MT-10 2022 experiences a loss of 450 GBP in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 180 GBP for a Yamaha XSR900 2018. Compared to Yamaha XSR900 2018 there are more Yamaha MT-10 2022 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 76 compared to 4. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 with 123 days compared to 151 days for the Yamaha MT-10. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 32 reviews for the Yamaha MT-10 and 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 since model year 2016. The first review for the Yamaha MT-10 was published on 17/11/2015 and now has more than 20,700 views. This compares to more than 17,600 views for the first review on Yamaha XSR900 published on 25/11/2015.

Price Yamaha MT-10

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH