Yamaha MT-10 2017 vs. Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-10 2017 vs Yamaha XSR900 2016

The Yamaha MT-10 2017 and the Yamaha XSR900 2016 are both naked bikes from Yamaha, but they have some key differences in terms of technical specifications and strengths.

Starting with the technical specifications, the Yamaha MT-10 2017 is equipped with a more powerful engine compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2016. The MT-10 has an inline 4-cylinder engine with a displacement of 998cc, producing 160 horsepower and 111 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the XSR900 has an inline 3-cylinder engine with a displacement of 847cc, producing 115 horsepower and 87.5 Nm of torque. This makes the MT-10 more powerful and provides better acceleration.

Both bikes have similar suspension setups, with upside-down telescopic forks in the front and a swing arm with a monoshock in the rear. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum, but the MT-10 has a Deltabox frame while the XSR900 has a Twin Tube frame. The Deltabox frame on the MT-10 is known for its rigidity and stability, providing better handling and control.

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 2017

In terms of braking, both bikes have double disc brakes in the front, but the MT-10 has larger 320mm diameter discs compared to the 298mm discs on the XSR900. This gives the MT-10 better stopping power and improved braking performance.

Both bikes come with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS and traction control. However, the XSR900 only has ABS as standard, while the MT-10 has both ABS and traction control as standard. This gives the MT-10 an advantage in terms of safety and control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the XSR900 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440mm compared to the 1400mm wheelbase of the MT-10. The seat height of the XSR900 is also slightly lower at 815mm compared to the 825mm seat height of the MT-10. The XSR900 is slightly lighter with a kerb weight of 191kg compared to the 210kg kerb weight of the MT-10. However, the MT-10 has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17 liters compared to the 14 liters of the XSR900.

Moving on to the strengths of each bike, the MT-10 is praised for its great sound, pleasant wind protection, and comfortable seating position even on long tours. It also has a great engine response and is considered a balanced overall package despite its radical looks and wicked sound.

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

On the other hand, the XSR900 is known for its greedy engine and well-tuned riding modes. It comes with ABS and traction control as standard, which is a plus for safety. The XSR900 also has an authentic modern design and clean workmanship.

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The MT-10 has a seating position that is too inactive on the racetrack, and its chassis and ride assistance systems are not on the same level as other Powernakeds. The XSR900 has a hard chassis and the seat could be more comfortable. Additionally, the speedblock design of the XSR900 is already seen on many other Yamaha models, which may be seen as a drawback for some.

In conclusion, the Yamaha MT-10 2017 and the Yamaha XSR900 2016 are both impressive naked bikes from Yamaha. The MT-10 offers more power and better overall performance, while the XSR900 has a unique design and comes with ABS and traction control as standard. Both bikes have their strengths and weaknesses, so it ultimately comes down to personal preference and intended use.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-10 2017 compared to Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2017
Yamaha XSR900 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque111 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.5
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement998 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel120 mmTravel137 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel120 mmTravel130 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDeltaboxFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake66 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail102 mmTrail103 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter298 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter245 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,095 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth800 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,110 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,400 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)210 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)191 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-10 2017

Yamaha MT-10 2017

The Yamaha MT-10 exudes a lot of emotion with the cool CP4 engine, but also doesn't forget pragmatic utility. For a naked bike, it offers a lot of comfort on long tours. It rides fast but is still refined at all times. On the racetrack, the chassis is not precise enough to beat the other Powernakeds. Overall, however, it scores with its versatility paired with radical looks and awesome sound.

great sound

pleasant wind protection

comfortable seating position even on long tours

great engine response

balanced overall package despite radical looks and wicked sound

Too inactive seating position on the racetrack

chassis and ride assistance systems sufficient for trackdays but not on the same level as the other Powernakeds.

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

The XSR900 combines the performance of a sporty streetfighter with the look of a pleasing, cleanly finished retro naked bike. In doing so, the Japanese make use of their own history, which can be found bundled and without gaps in the archive of the design agency that has been working for Yamaha for 60 years. It adopts the virtues of the MT-09 and has mended some of its weaknesses. It rides more harmoniously, more controlled and, if desired, more relaxed. Only the comfort, and thus the rider, suffers from the tight chassis on bad roads. You have to be a little bit sensitive when it comes to a neo-classic.

Greedy engine

well-tuned riding modes

ABS and TC as standard

authentic modern design

clean workmanship

hard chassis

seat should be more comfortable

speedblock design already on many other models

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-10 vs Yamaha XSR900

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-10 2017 and a Yamaha XSR900 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-10 2017 is about 54% higher. A Yamaha MT-10 2017 experiences a loss of 1,010 GBP in one year and 1,700 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1,680 GBP and 1,690 GBP for a Yamaha XSR900 2016. Compared to Yamaha XSR900 2016 there are more Yamaha MT-10 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 12 compared to 5. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 with 77 days compared to 143 days for the Yamaha MT-10. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 32 reviews for the Yamaha MT-10 and 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 since model year 2016. The first review for the Yamaha MT-10 was published on 17/11/2015 and now has more than 20,700 views. This compares to more than 17,600 views for the first review on Yamaha XSR900 published on 25/11/2015.

Price Yamaha MT-10

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH