KTM 250 SX 2014 vs. KTM 690 Duke 2009

KTM 250 SX 2014

KTM 250 SX 2014

KTM 690 Duke 2009

KTM 690 Duke 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications KTM 250 SX 2014 compared to KTM 690 Duke 2009

KTM 250 SX 2014
KTM 690 Duke 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore66.4 mmBore102 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement249 ccmDisplacement654 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeTubular

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,472 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height992 mmSeat Height865 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.5 lFuel Tank Capacity13.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 250 SX 2014

KTM 250 SX 2014

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

KTM 690 Duke 2009

KTM 690 Duke 2009

Are there so many people who don't need 100 hp to stabilise their ego? I think with previous single-cylinder models, it was always the design that was the problem, not the lack of power. The Duke manages to look really high-quality even as a small single-cylinder.

Stable frame

relatively low overall weight

good chassis

high-quality components

strong braking system

handling.

Significantly weaker single-cylinder engine

somewhat less comfort

somewhat less power.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 250 SX vs KTM 690 Duke

Price KTM 250 SX

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 690 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH