Yamaha MT-10 2016 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-10 2016 vs BMW S 1000 R 2014

The Yamaha MT-10 2016 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are both naked bikes with similar engine specifications. They both have an in-line, 4-cylinder engine with a displacement of around 1000cc. The engine power is also the same at 160 HP for both bikes. However, the Yamaha MT-10 has a torque of 111 Nm, while the BMW S 1000 R has a slightly higher torque of 112 Nm.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. They also both have a monoshock shock absorber. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum, but the Yamaha MT-10 has a Deltabox frame, while the BMW S 1000 R has a Twin Tube frame.

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2016

When it comes to braking, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front. The Yamaha MT-10 comes with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS and traction control, while the BMW S 1000 R has dynamic suspension as an additional advanced rider assistance system.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire width and diameter. The wheelbase of the Yamaha MT-10 is slightly shorter at 1400 mm compared to the 1439 mm of the BMW S 1000 R. The seat height of the Yamaha MT-10 is slightly higher at 825 mm compared to the 814 mm of the BMW S 1000 R. The kerb weight of the Yamaha MT-10 is slightly heavier at 210 kg compared to the 207 kg of the BMW S 1000 R. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of around 17 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha MT-10 is praised for its CP4 engine, which gives it a strong character and an unmistakable sound. It is also highly agile and offers high-speed stability. The brakes are strong and reliable. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R is known for its sporty chassis and extreme power and performance. It also offers very good electronic helpers and has a terrific price/performance ratio. It is fast and comfortable on both the racetrack and country roads.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

However, the Yamaha MT-10 has some weaknesses, including poor comfort, limited wind protection, and a hard fit. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R has a slightly rough engine running and the dynamic suspension is rather on the "hard" side overall. The seat is relatively high, and the design is a matter of taste.

In conclusion, both the Yamaha MT-10 2016 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are powerful naked bikes with similar engine specifications. They have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-10 2016 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014

Yamaha MT-10 2016
BMW S 1000 R 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque111 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement998 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter46 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDeltaboxFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspension

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,095 mmLength2,057 mm
WidthWidth800 mmWidth845 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,400 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height814 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)210 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2016

The short and stocky MT-10 is the furthest away from the R1 superbike of the renowned power naked bikes, both in terms of looks and chassis, but the heart of the MT-10 is directly descended from the racetrack weapon and fascinates with a uniquely raw sound and power from below thanks to the typical crank pin offset, which, with a modified firing order, ensures this unique character. The resulting 160 hp therefore only seem a little weak on paper compared to the more than 200 hp of the R1, in reality the MT-10 also ignites incredible fireworks. The suspension would probably be too soft for the race track, but it is just right for a country road fight, and the brakes do the same - probably only acceptable for the track, but perfect for the country road.

CP4 engine

strong character

extremely agile

high-speed stability

strong brakes

unmistakable sound

Poor comfort

limited wind protection

hard fit

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.

Sporty chassis

extreme power and performance

very good electronic helpers

terrific price/performance ratio

fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.

Slightly rough engine running

DDC works well, but still rather on the "hard" side overall

seat relatively high

tempts to overdrive

design a matter of taste.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-10 vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-10 2016 and a BMW S 1000 R 2014. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-10 2016 is about 4% higher. A Yamaha MT-10 2016 experiences a loss of 810 GBP in one year and 1,870 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 600 GBP and 620 GBP for a BMW S 1000 R 2014. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014 there are less Yamaha MT-10 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 7 compared to 19. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 70 days compared to 97 days for the Yamaha MT-10. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 32 reviews for the Yamaha MT-10 and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Yamaha MT-10 was published on 17/11/2015 and now has more than 20,700 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 03/11/2013.

Price Yamaha MT-10

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH