Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 vs. Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 vs Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 compared to Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power72 HPEngine power95 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement799 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,405 mmWheelbase1,530 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height810 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.5 lFuel Tank Capacity19 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki doesn't build toys. The ER-6N is getting more serious - and remains beginner-friendly.

Lightness

precision

rideability

modern, dynamic look

beginner-friendly

trustworthy ergonomics

ABS.

Sitting position with regard to the footrests uncomfortable from 1.80m

hardly suitable for wheelies

Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs Triumph Tiger 800

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Tiger 800

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH