Triumph Daytona 675 2010 vs. Suzuki GSX-R 600 2011

Triumph Daytona 675 2010

Suzuki GSX-R 600 2011
Loading...
Technical Specifications Triumph Daytona 675 2010 compared to Suzuki GSX-R 600 2011
Triumph Daytona 675 2010
Suzuki GSX-R 600 2011
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 74 mm | Bore | 67 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 52.3 mm | Stroke | 42.5 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 126 HP | Engine power | 125 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 12,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 13,500 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 72 Nm | Torque | 68.6 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 11,750 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 11,500 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 12.65 | Compression Ratio | 12.8 |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 3 | Cylinders | 4 |
Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | DOHC |
Displacement | Displacement | 675 ccm | Displacement | 599 ccm |
Suspension Front
Adjustment | Adjustment | Compression, Rebound | Adjustment | Compression, Preload, Rebound |
---|
Suspension Rear
Adjustment | Adjustment | Compression, Rebound | Adjustment | Compression, Preload, Rebound |
---|
Chassis
Frame type | Frame type | Twin Tube | Frame type | Twin-Spar |
---|
Brakes Front
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Four pistons |
---|
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Single piston | Piston | Double piston |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 180 mm | Rear tyre width | 180 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 55 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,010 mm | Length | 2,040 mm |
Width | Width | 710 mm | Width | 715 mm |
Height | Height | 1,120 mm | Height | 1,125 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,415 mm | Wheelbase | 1,400 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 830 mm | Seat Height | 810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.4 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 17 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Triumph Daytona 675 2010

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Suzuki GSX-R 600 2011

The above average handling and carefree acceleration manoeuvres with the Suzuki kind of do it to you! For newcomers to the ring, this is a good bike to consider, as it is easy to ride, forgiving of mistakes and also has enough power, which is easy to control to boot!
Safe driving feeling and yet of high sportiness
appears agile
low weight
Relatively low power for the racetrack
relatively slow on the straights
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Daytona 675 vs Suzuki GSX-R 600
Price Triumph Daytona 675
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Suzuki GSX-R 600
Model year
Current average market prices